Re: 2nd call for help

1998-03-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, You can generate a changes file using dpkg-genchanges as long as you have a changelog file, and a control file. Oh, I missed the changes file following your signature ;-), Or I would have cobbled together a ./debian directory to start you off; get the file started, and then

Re: 2nd call for help

1998-03-09 Thread G John Lapeyre
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Zed Pobre wrote: > and private was for release-critical issues, the inaccuracy of which has > been made (pointedly) apparant to me several times now. Yeah don't worry about it. Everyone does it wrong at first. Also, develop a thick skin with regard to comments from o

Re: Problem with binary package and dupload

1998-03-09 Thread James Troup
Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >- Clear about 500 meg free somewhere. :) >- Use the debhelper scripts to set up the package building > location. \begin{minor detail} You don't have to use debhelper, you could do it by hand or (ick) use debstd; whatever takes your fancy. \en

Re: new maintainer docs

1998-03-09 Thread Martin Schulze
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 11:45:51AM -0500, Shaleh wrote: > I have found the new maintainer docs on debian's site. Is there a > package or tar file of them? I would like to have them for offline > browsing. Take a look at wget if they're not in a package yet and download the files to your machine.

Re: Problem with binary package and dupload

1998-03-09 Thread James Troup
Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > did you use "dpkg-buildpackage" or its wrapper "build"? > > If yes what options did you used? > > No. It's a binary-only package. There is no debian/rules file > available for either of those programs to use. Umm, so write one. Take a look at another

Re: 2nd call for help

1998-03-09 Thread James Troup
Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ This is definitely not appropriate for debian-private ] > > Could you explain to me what debian-private is, then? A closed mailing list which only developers are subscribed to; it's supposed only to be used for politically or technically sensitive disc

Re: Deciding on a section

1998-03-09 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 9 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > look at similar packages: > mirror is in net > lftp (which has a mirror command) is in net > wget (which can _also_ mirror with ftp) is in web Mmm, maybe wget should be in net also :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: PGP and fakeroot

1998-03-09 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sun, 8 Mar 1998, Richard A Nelson wrote: > To build sendmail, I used: "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" from my > normal id (cowboy). > > Everything seemed to go fine except for a few items: > 1) Needing root to rm debian/tmp (everthing was owned by cowboy.

Re: Deciding on a section

1998-03-09 Thread fpolacco
On Sun, Mar 08, 1998 at 03:05:54PM -0800, George Bonser wrote: > > I built a debian package of mirrordir. It works much like mirror that is > > In the making of the control file for the package, I am trying to decide > which section to place it in. The candidates would be admin, misc, and > uti

Re: Problem with binary package and dupload

1998-03-09 Thread fpolacco
On Sun, Mar 08, 1998 at 03:45:17PM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > I first put this on debian-devel and was told it should be moved here. > They also gave you hints on your problem. I'll repeat: did you use "dpkg-buildpackage" or its wrapper "build"? If yes what

Re: 2nd call for help

1998-03-09 Thread bruce
Zed, IRAF - that's an astronomical ephemerides, is it not? You can log in to "master" and download the source there, so that it bypasses your modem. We _really_ want to distribute the source. It's not Debian policy to distribute programs without the source if we can get the source at all. I sus

Re: 2nd call for help

1998-03-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, [IMHO, in no circumstances does it make sense to cross post to debian-private, since -private is meant for private stuff, and the orhers are not] How did the changes file get created? If dupload can't parse it, there is a good chance that there may be a flaw i

new maintainer docs

1998-03-09 Thread Shaleh
I have found the new maintainer docs on debian's site. Is there a package or tar file of them? I would like to have them for offline browsing.

Re: help on creating a lib package

1998-03-09 Thread Shaleh
Would you mind pointing me in the direction of HOW to do that. I have not seen a document nicely describe how to setup virtual packages.

Re: 2nd call for help

1998-03-09 Thread James Troup
[ This is definitely not appropriate for debian-private ] Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tomorrow, if nobody knows what's going on, I will bypass dupload and > upload my packages and the associated .changes files to master > manually. There's nothing wrong with that, I've never used dup

Re: help on creating a lib package

1998-03-09 Thread James Troup
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am packaging imlib (image lib). It can use giflib which is > non-free. I would like to make a ver that does and one that does > not. Suggestions on how to do this?? Virtual package? A super and > a minor package (one provides/overrides other)??? I'd sug

Re: Question about new-maintainers@debian.org

1998-03-09 Thread Martin Schulze
On Thu, Mar 05, 1998 at 11:28:41PM -0600, Ender Wigin wrote: > How long does it take (on average) for the new-maintainer people to > process stuff and get you set up as a maintainer? This depends on our work load and on the number of submitted requests. If everything goes quick it only takes 1

Re: PGP and fakeroot

1998-03-09 Thread Adam Klein
On Sun, Mar 08, 1998 at 05:31:05PM -0500, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > To build sendmail, I used: "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" from my > normal id (cowboy). > > Everything seemed to go fine except for a few items: > 1) Needing root to rm debian/tmp (everthing was owned by cowboy.cowboy) >

Re: bug fixing and uploading.

1998-03-09 Thread Richard Braakman
G John Lapeyre wrote: > I checked my lintian web entry. I can knock off some fixes > rapidly. Others will take some time. Do I upload a new version after > the easy fixes, or wait for other fixes, or ? Always a difficult call. Personally I like to keep the code on my disk in sync

some dependency problems

1998-03-09 Thread Gergely Madarasz
Hello! I have a problem with the php3 package. There is the main package which contains a loadable module for apache called mod_php3.so. There are some additional packages containing loadable modules for php, like pgsql.so. The current php3-pgsql, which contains pgsql.so depends on php3 with no ve