Re: gv depends on ghostscript, which depends on gsfonts

1998-03-01 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
--- /tmp/blah Sat Feb 28 22:39:24 1998 +++ /tmp/blah2 Sat Feb 28 22:40:02 1998 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ This is concerning: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/18/18026.html> ] - Please Cc: relevant responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED] + Please Cc: pertinent responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't think t

Re: conventions for packaging (ie: docs)

1998-03-01 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Adam" == Adam P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> Mind you, I think splitting docs is generally a good idea, I'd often like to install just the docs so I can find out what something is, and read about it a little to decide whether I need it or not.

gv depends on ghostscript, which depends on gsfonts

1998-03-01 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
[ cc'd to _debian-mentors_. *Please advise*. This is concerning: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/18/18026.html> ] Please Cc: relevant responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't think that `gv' needs to depend on the `gsfonts' package, since it depends upon `gs' | `gs-aladdin', which should dep