Re: conventions for packaging.

Anand Kumria wrote: > - should it be installed in /usr/sbin (it is a set-uid network diag > program) Probably, I'm not 100% sure. > - is the man page regarded as architecture independant? Well, it is architecture independant, but we don't split out seperate packages for things like a single man

Re: conventions for packaging.

On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, Anand Kumria wrote: > I've decided to try my hand at being a debian developer; and have picked > mtr (from the orphaned list) as something to try. Some questions: > > - - should it be installed in /usr/sbin (it is a set-uid network diag > program) I've never seen the point i

Re: conventions for packaging.

On Fri, Feb 20, 1998 at 03:52:56AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > I've decided to try my hand at being a debian developer; and have picked > mtr (from the orphaned list) as something to try. Some questions: > > - - should it be installed in /usr/sbin (it is a set-uid network diag > program) Is it

conventions for packaging.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I've decided to try my hand at being a debian developer; and have picked mtr (from the orphaned list) as something to try. Some questions: - - should it be installed in /usr/sbin (it is a set-uid network diag program) - - is the man page regarded as architectur