Re: Hamm bootdisks - testing

1998-02-17 Thread Joost Kooij
On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Jeff Sheinberg wrote: > > I recently downloaded the hamm bootdisks. Then I used them to boot up a > clean hamm system from scratch. I forget to download the drv1440.bin > file; however, in the process, I have accumulated lots of subjective > comments that I would like to sh

Hamm bootdisks - testing

1998-02-17 Thread Jeff Sheinberg
I recently downloaded the hamm bootdisks. Then I used them to boot up a clean hamm system from scratch. I forget to download the drv1440.bin file; however, in the process, I have accumulated lots of subjective comments that I would like to share. My objective is to help make the Debian bootup f

Re: Packaging imlib

1998-02-17 Thread Martin Schulze
On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 07:20:59PM +, Luis Francisco Gonzalez wrote: > Hi, > Imlib sources have support for x-based imlib in one directory and gdkimlib > in another. The way I have decided to go about packaging this (is this > the way to go?) is to have a top-level debian/rules that calls a Y

Re: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?

1998-02-17 Thread Adam Klein
On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 05:13:14PM +0100, tibor simko wrote: > hi mentors: > > i'd like to ask what is the correct way to upload a bo-compiled > `foo_1.0bo1' debian package into bo-unstable. namely, i saw people > specifying either of the: > > Distribution: bo-unstable > Distribution: unstab

Re: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?

1998-02-17 Thread Martin Schulze
On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 05:13:14PM +0100, tibor simko wrote: > hi mentors: > > i'd like to ask what is the correct way to upload a bo-compiled > `foo_1.0bo1' debian package into bo-unstable. namely, i saw people > specifying either of the: > > Distribution: bo-unstable This should be it. Reg

Packaging imlib

1998-02-17 Thread Luis Francisco Gonzalez
Hi, Imlib sources have support for x-based imlib in one directory and gdkimlib in another. The way I have decided to go about packaging this (is this the way to go?) is to have a top-level debian/rules that calls a debian/rules file for each of these directories so that there is only one source pa

bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?

1998-02-17 Thread tibor simko
hi mentors: i'd like to ask what is the correct way to upload a bo-compiled `foo_1.0bo1' debian package into bo-unstable. namely, i saw people specifying either of the: Distribution: bo-unstable Distribution: unstable Distribution: stable in their bo-compiled debian packages. which one i

Re: making SGML package (sdc) sgml-base compliant

1998-02-17 Thread Adam P. Harris
"Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> "Adam" == Adam P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> However, I suspect the package is not going to cope too well Adam> with all the DTD files being moved. > Umm. What appears to be the problem? Umm! To be honest, I haven't

Re: making SGML package (sdc) sgml-base compliant

1998-02-17 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Adam" == Adam P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> Christian, in /usr/doc/sgml-base/README.Debian, you say: >> The location of SGML description files (DTD's, entities, etc.) is >> /usr/lib/sgml . All DTD's should be installed in /usr/lib/sgml/dtd >> , all entity description files sho

making SGML package (sdc) sgml-base compliant

1998-02-17 Thread Adam P. Harris
Christian, in /usr/doc/sgml-base/README.Debian, you say: | The location of SGML description files (DTD's, entities, etc.) is | /usr/lib/sgml . All DTD's should be installed in /usr/lib/sgml/dtd , | all entity description files should go into /usr/lib/sgml/entities . I just took over maintenance