[You ("David B. Miles")]
>I am unable to locate the Help/How To Homepage on Laptops.
>
>Would someone please make this URL available to me?
If you mean the Linux Laptop Homepage, it's
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/linux-laptop/
Other than that, I get most my info from the vendors (in m
I recently took over the lpr package from Sven Rudolph.
I'm not going to be makeing an upload for a little while,
but there are some bugs that can be closed right now.
In the developers-reference, it says to send a message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in order to list my email
address on the bug system.
I am unable to locate the Help/How To Homepage on Laptops.
Would someone please make this URL available to me?
Thanks ahead of time,
dblm
I'm still not too hip to all of the steps of packaging, so I tried to
package a very simple existing package that's looking for a new maintainer
- bonnie.
If someone could grab it from ftp.ececs.uc.edu:/pub/users/dmartin/debian
and tell me what's broken in it, I'd appreciate it. One thing I noti
Marcelo E. Magallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is on the control file for sp:
>
> Package: sp
> Architecture: any
> Conflicts: sp (<=1.1.1-2)
> Replaces: sp
>
> what's the intention of this? A package conflicting with a previous
> version of itself?
It makes no sense, please remove it.
This is on the control file for sp:
Package: sp
Architecture: any
Conflicts: sp (<=1.1.1-2)
Replaces: sp
what's the intention of this? A package conflicting with a previous
version of itself?
Marcelo
I've taken over maintenance of the 'addressbook' package. I need some
advice, not so much on the technical side, but rather the "whats the
right way to interpret policy" issue.
First off, there's a global config file /usr/lib/addressbook/addressbook.config
which clearly needs to be moved into
Thanks to debian-mentors. I've changed my 'addressbook' package to
use my debian.org address. The solution is of course to 'pgp -ke' on my
key, resubmit that at my leisure, and change the files, re-upload. Am
working on some other fixes too.
It would be "cute" to masquerade all my debian-re
On Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 12:23:57PM -0500, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> A lot of developers on the policy list seem to think that it would be
> better if package maintainers used their debian.org email address as the
> maintainer address for any packages they own.
It is definetly better, because your
9 matches
Mail list logo
