Re: Processed: More non-free packages

Ulf Fredriksson wrote: > I'm both the maintainer and author (one of them any way) of tcpquota... I > uploaded version 1.6.10 a while back with the line: > > tcpquota (1.6.10-1) unstable contrib; urgency=low > > as the header in the 'debian/changelog' file to rectify the #17595 bug... That > vers

Re: Processed: More non-free packages

James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > a) You closed bug #17595 before the new tcpquota was installed into >the archive. Bugs are meant to be closed when the bug is dealt >with *and* the fixed version is available to the general public. > b) You closed the bug with 0, zero, none, zilch

Re: Processed: More non-free packages

Ulf Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > reopen 17595 > > Bug#17595: tcpquota depends on non-free packages > > Bug reopened, originator not changed. [ ... ] > tcpquota (1.6.10-1) unstable contrib; urgency=low > > as the header in the 'debian/changelog' file to rectify the #17595 > bug.

Re: Processed: More non-free packages

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson) writes: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > reopen 17595 > Bug#17595: tcpquota depends on non-free packages > Bug reopened, originator not changed. > > > severity 17595 important > Bug#17595: tcpquota depends on non-free packages > Severity set to `imp

Re: My first packages -- some questions.

Hi Guys! I've put my packages back together without debmake helper scripts, and I feel much more confidant now that I know what is going on. A big help was Igor Grobman's unfinished work, the "Debian Programmers Manual" http://www.pics.com/~igor/debian/programmer.html/index.html which contain