Re: Orthanc 0.5.1

2013-04-17 Thread s . jodogne
> I have just updated the DebianMed repository with the newest upstream > version of Orthanc (0.5.1) [1]. Please would you kindly upload it to > unstable? Thanks in advance! > > [1] > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/ Thank you for the upload, Mathi

Re: Orthanc 0.5.2

2013-05-11 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Mathieu, As I understand, this seems to be problem that is related to a recent update of the Boost package [1]. Sadly, we will have to wait before it gets fixed. Cheers, Sébastien- [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695826 > At least on two of my machine I am getting:

Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-10 Thread s . jodogne
Dear all, I have just uploaded a Debian package for Orthanc 0.6.2 that has been released earlier this week [1]. This release introduces "Orthanc Client". Orthanc Client is a SDK that allows a third-party software to connect to an instance of Orthanc from C++ code using the REST API of Orthanc.

Re: Bug #737448: Review needed for the Orthanc package

2014-03-06 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Andreas, The bug in the Boost package has been tagged as fixed now [1]. Please would you kindly try again? Thanks, Sébastien- [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739904 > Unfortunately the package does not build in pbuilder. Sebastien, are > you > able to verify this?

Re: Orthanc 0.7.4

2014-04-28 Thread s . jodogne
> > I have just fixed the errors and warnings [1]. > > I have uploaded even if > >I: liborthancclient-doc: >possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration > > would deserve some handling for the next package version Thanks! > - just tell me > if you have no idea how to do this. Y

Re: New version of orthanc

2014-10-14 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Andreas, Sorry for the delay and thanks for your help! I have applied all the required fixes (notably to the default configuration file and to the manpage). All my integration tests pass. As far as I am concerned, the package is now ready for upload. Regards, Sébastien- > I tried to upgra

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-06 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Andreas, > > My question is related to Debian Med: Would anyone be interested in > > packaging this plugin for Debian? > > For me this sounds pretty useful. If you might consider packaging it > yourself I would support this if any questions might occure. Is there any package in Debian Med th

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-07 Thread s . jodogne
Hi, > > Is there any package in Debian Med that contains an ImageJ plugin? > > I would need such an example as a starting point. > > I'm not aware of any such example. [...] OK, this confirms my understanding :) > The ImageJ documentation might provide some help where to put the > files > belo

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-08 Thread s . jodogne
> My plugin is already correctly packaged wrt. the ImageJ SDK. But > could you recommend some nicely packaged software for Debian that > uses a combination of Java and CMake? This would be quite useful for > me. Side question: Should my plugin be part of the "orthanc" package [1], of the "imagej"

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-08 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Andreas and Karsten, > > Side question: Should my plugin be part of the "orthanc" package > > [1], of the "imagej" package, or should it be fully standalone? > > It is probably a lot easier for you to make it part of the > orthanc package. Mid-air collision with Andreas' answer, who would fav

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-08 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Andreas, > I (stubbornly ;-)) stick to my opinion for a separate package since > orthanc works perfectly without the imagej plugin and as far as I > understand its also a separate source. So its pretty natural to have > a > separate package but you can Suggest (or even Recommend) the plugin >

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Andreas, > sorry for my silence for longer than usual. I'm recovering slowly > from > my vacation (basically for the sake of OpenStreetMap work after the > trip > ;-)). :) > I had a look into the package. It builds fine and is lintian clean > and > I simply assume that it is working (I hav

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread s . jodogne
> I admit I know to less about Java but the "merge" you are mentioning > in a) is not clear to me. If you Build-Depend on libjson-simple-java > the JAR which is in Debian's CLASSPATH will be available as well for > the installed package if you Depend from libjson-simple-java. So > I see no reason

Re: ImageJ plugin for Orthanc

2014-12-15 Thread s . jodogne
> > So, there would be a global CLASSPATH that is shared across all the > > JVMs available in Debian, and that is implicitly used by the > > ImageJ package? Anyone could confirm this? > > As far as I know any JAR that's found in /usr/share/java will be > included in CLASSPATH. (Please correct me

Re: Bug#689041: Re: Orthanc

2012-10-05 Thread s . jodogne
Hi Mathieu, > >> An alternative would be to use "libcurl4-gnutls-dev | > >> libcurl4-dev". > > > > Thank for your reply! I have just uploaded another version of the > > package > > with your suggested improvement: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orthanc/orthanc_0.2.2-3.dsc > > Wh