Hi Andreas,
Excuse the formatting, I'm using the corporate OWA server which mangles mail
like outlook. Look for [amul:2] below.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:41:34AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote:
> >I also wonder whether you could forward the "spelling-error-in-binary"
> >type lintian infos to upstream.
>
Hi Andreas,
I apologize in advance for the horrid formatting that Outlook does to mails.
From: Amul Shah [amul.s...@fisglobal.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:26 AM
To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [fis-gtm] Updating fis-gtm to V6.2-001
Sent via OWA2010
From: Andreas Tille [andr...@an3as.eu]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 2:47 PM
To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [fis-gtm] Updating fis-gtm to V6.2-001
Hi Amul,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 02:01:17PM -0500, Amul Shah wrote:
> >
> >
[sorry for the top post, Outlook doesn't do proper quoting]
Hi Andreas,
I uploaded the latest version of GT.M that we released yesterday. I tagged the
version as unstable. Let me know if that was the correct thing to do.
As always, thanks for help.
Amul
From: Bh
Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 01:19:46PM +0000, Shah, Amul wrote:
>> I uploaded the latest version of GT.M that we released yesterday.
> Thanks for your work on this.
>
>> I tagged the version as unstable. Let me know if that was the correct thing
>> to do.
> Perfect. Unfortun
Luis,
GT.M Regression Test Suite results are nearly complete. With the exception of a
few configuration related issues and tests that need to be fixed, everything is
in good shape.
The first round of testing hit a latent GT.M bug that is fixed in the upcoming
release. I back ported the change w
ro) represents a minor feature change in the product
- Patch is an alphabet denoting an emergency single change release
[amul] GT.M database formats (major version) change infrequently. Inside a
database version, GT.M is tested in various upgrade<->downgrade scenarios.
Meaning that there should
ignore it with respect to the version number?
Currently V6.3-014 has a FTBFS #1011722 logged against it. It would be good to
get V7.0-003 in the testing stream to close the bug.
Thanks,
Amul
From: Shah, Amul
Date: Friday, 06 17, 2022 at 04:04 PM
To: Andreas Tille , Debian Med Project List
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for updating to the latest GT.M version! GT.M V7 dropped support for x86
due to the transition to 64bit block IDs.
If I could get through the corporate firewall, I would drop i386 from the
“Architecture” sections in debian/control. Sorry, about that.
Thanks,
Amul
From: Debia
All,
I need some guidance. The host where we encountered a bug is sitting in a lab
environment with no direct Internet access. Below is the output from reportbug
with the print-only option.
I am filing a bug against glibc 2.36 due to a bug in memcmp-sse2.S that causes
fis-gtm to segfault possib
10 matches
Mail list logo
