Thanks Mathieu et al. for your work!
For all of you who are interested in the DCMTK:
The new version 3.6.0 has just been released.
See http://www.dcmtk.org/ for details.
Regards,
Jörg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
DCMTK release 3.6.0, e.g. the section on "Debian specific notes" is not
100% correct any more.
- The name of the "02_dcmtk_3.5.4-3.patch" should be changed IMHO.
- Unused patches (not in "series") should be removed from the package.
We will also answer to your e
x option.
=== CUT ===
I could also not find such patches in your package (probably, since they are
not needed any longer :-).
Btw, you should probably also update the "signature line" at the end of the
"dcmtk.README.Debian" file.
Regards,
Jörg Riesmeier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that the OFFIS DICOM Toolkit DCMTK is also
available as an "inofficial" Debian package (as part of the CDMEDIC PACS
project):
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=61662&package_id=60300
Regards,
Joerg
On Sunday 24 October 2004 20:24, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Do you have interest to get this package sponsored to become an official
> Debian package? I think this is the best quality to ensure the package
> quality and get into the focus of general Debian users.
Of course, we would encourage you or
Hi,
it seems that the CTN (Central Test Node) related official Debian package ctn,
ctn-dev and ctn-doc are missing on the web pages of the Debian-Med project.
Am I right?
Regards,
Joerg
Dear Pablo,
I'm not sure whether you've ever heard of the Debian-Med project:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/
Yesterday, I posted to their mailing list that you've created a Debian
package from the DICOM toolkit DCMTK as part of your CDMEDIC PACS project
(see http://lists.debian.org/debia
Hi,
here are a few more observations on the current list of medical software
projects:
- DICOMscope is currently only listed under "Control of medical devices" but
not under "Medical Imaging". The same applies to the newly added CTN
project. Maybe, it would better to more clearly distinguis
Andreas,
> So I think we should remove this package from "Control of medical devices"
> and start a new section "Medical image communication". Would you think
> that other program packages should go into this section.
I would suggest to move (or copy?) the following projects to the new
category "
Andreas,
> So maybe a section "Medical imaging" would be appropriate and will lead
> all users to the right direction while the exact description of the
> project will serve for the details?
maybe, you're right: Summarize all medical imaging related project in one
category and retire "Control of
Andreas,
>> Maybe, it would be worth asking readers of the newsgroup to contribute to
>> your Debian-Med project. At least you could make it more "visible" in the
>> DICOM community :-)
> This is also a good idea and I would love if a reader of this group would
> take over this job. ON the other
Dear Pablo,
> It would be nice to contribute, but I would need some help in the steps I
> must follow to produce an official Debian package.
thank you for your positive response. I think that Andreas already offered
his help in this regard. Unfortunately, I am no expert on the Debian package
sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Upstream Author : Marco Eichelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for your efforts. However, if the contact information of the upstream
author is stored somewhere I would prefer to use the following email address:
Upstream Author : OFFIS DICOM Team
Dear all,
> Indeed, and there is a simple fix too, which has been uploaded to
> experimental only so far:
yes, there is a simple fix (that disables the error), but there is also a more
fundamental fix that (hopefully) solves the issue at its core:
https://git.dcmtk.org/?p=dcmtk.git;a=commi
14 matches
Mail list logo
