Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Frith, Martin
Do any of lamassemble's dependencies (e.g. mafft) fail tests? On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 3:36 PM Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi again, > > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:10:14PM +0900, Frith, Martin wrote: > > Wow, amazingly fast!!! > > lamassemble fails its tests on i386 (see here[1]) -- could you fix > ac

Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 7/11/22 12:26 PM, Frith, Martin wrote: Sorry I lack experience with this, so I have some questions... No prob. Were the tests passing before? Was there a specific update after which they failed? They were always failing on version 1.4.2 which is the only version I had every uploaded.

Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Frith, Martin
Sorry I lack experience with this, so I have some questions... Were the tests passing before? Was there a specific update after which they failed? And they're still passing except on i386? Have a nice day, Martin On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 3:53 PM Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 03:

Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Frith, Martin
Dear Nilesh and Debian Med (cc MAFFT author Katohさん) I have partly tracked down this lamassemble issue. First, I tested lamassemble on x86_64: the tests passed as expected. Then, I recompiled MAFFT after adding "-m32" to CFLAGS, which compiled it in 32-bit mode. Now, the tests in lamassemble/tests

Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Martin and Katoh, On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 06:40:51PM +0900, Frith, Martin wrote: > Dear Nilesh and Debian Med > (cc MAFFT author Katohさん) > > I have partly tracked down this lamassemble issue. First, I tested > lamassemble on x86_64: the tests passed as expected. Then, I recompiled > MAFFT aft

Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Frith, Martin
Hi Nilesh, after some searching and experimentation, I think `-ffloat-store` doesn't always solve this floating point issue. But this seems to solve it: `-msse2 -mfpmath=sse`. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html I hope that

Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 7/11/22 6:14 PM, Frith, Martin wrote: Hi Nilesh, after some searching and experimentation, I think `-ffloat-store` doesn't always solve this floating point issue. But this seems to solve it: `-msse2 -mfpmath=sse`. Unfortunately I can't use these as it would violate i386 baseline that debia

Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

2022-07-11 Thread Frith, Martin
This also seems to work: `-mpc64` On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:16 PM Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 7/11/22 6:14 PM, Frith, Martin wrote: > > Hi Nilesh, > > > > after some searching and experimentation, I think `-ffloat-store` > doesn't always solve this floating point issue. > > But this seems to solv

Added autopkgtests for megadepth

2022-07-11 Thread Mohd Bilal
Hello team, I have added autopkgtests for megadepth[1]. Requesting someone to review and sponsor my changes. [1] - https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/megadepth -- ╭╮ │ Mohammed Bilal │ │ 2D65 BC1E B966 5A6E

Re: Added autopkgtests for megadepth

2022-07-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:54:45PM +0530, Mohd Bilal wrote: > Hello team, > > I have added autopkgtests for megadepth[1]. Requesting someone to review and > sponsor my changes. Good! Thanks, uploaded. However please take in a look at my second-last commit, helps package get cross-building. In thi

Re: Naming scheme of fis-gtm binary packages (Was: Bug#1009900: fis-gtm: Multiple CVEs in fis-gtm)

2022-07-11 Thread Shah, Amul
Hi Andreas, We discussed this in the group and a number of people were not comfortable with removing the current versioning scheme. Let me revise my explanation of our versioning: GT.M’s versioning follows this scheme: DBVersion.Major-Minor[Patch] - DBVersion corresponds to the database block

Re: Bug#1014647: ITP: abpoa -- adaptive banded Partial Order Alignment

2022-07-11 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Bastian, Bastian Germann, on 2022-07-11: > parsnp 1.7.4 does no longer need this because it comes with > https://github.com/marbl/parsnp/pull/117 Thank you for your interest and your notice, I'm pulling the latest upstream version of parsnp, working just right without python3-pyabpoa. Hi ftp

Re: Naming scheme of fis-gtm binary packages (Was: Bug#1009900: fis-gtm: Multiple CVEs in fis-gtm)

2022-07-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Amul, Am Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 07:51:55PM + schrieb Shah, Amul: > Hi Andreas, > We discussed this in the group and a number of people were not comfortable > with removing the current versioning scheme. Let me revise my explanation of > our versioning: > > GT.M’s versioning follows this sc