Re: python3-scanpy 1.6.0 patched, could you take a look?

2021-03-23 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2021-03-23 12:18, Andreas Tille wrote: > I was pointed in some mails (which I'm to busy to seek for) by members > of the Python team to prefix source package names by 'python-' and I'm > following this recommendation. I see > I know there are counter-examples but > it also fits my personal ta

Re: python3-scanpy 1.6.0 patched, could you take a look?

2021-03-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Robbi, On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:49:34AM +0800, Robbi Nespu wrote: > > thanks for looking into scanpy. > You are welcome, this package I choose during Debian med online sprint and > make me packaging it dependencies which is python-stdlib-list[1] and > python-sinfo[2], which I so happy and gla

Re: python3-scanpy 1.6.0 patched, could you take a look?

2021-03-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:22:49AM -0700, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Makes sense. Since you thin we should be extra picky about it, do you > think we should add > it into our policy somehow, or maybe add it into FAQ or some page that > is easily accessible and/or handy? Yes, that makes sense. It wo

Re: Which columns should we start working on?

2021-03-23 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Nilesh, Am 22.03.21 um 12:41 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > >> I'm mostly addressing you specifically here for the new "workflow based" >> packages we should start working on -- as you mentioned at the sprints. >> Since freeze work should _mostly_ be done by now, we could focus on new >> packages :-

Re: python3-scanpy 1.6.0 patched, could you take a look?

2021-03-23 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi all, hi Robbi in particular, Am 23.03.21 um 09:16 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:22:49AM -0700, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> Makes sense. Since you thin we should be extra picky about it, do you >> think we should add >> it into our policy somehow, or maybe add it into FAQ or som