Hi Steffen,
Le 11/09/2020 à 15:27, Steffen Möller a écrit :
> Hello again,
>
> [...]
>
> and the error prevails when minimizing the invocation as to
>
>
> ~/git/med-team/pigx/pigx-scrnaseq$ /usr/bin/java -XX:ParallelGCThreads=1
> -Xmx4G -Xss16M -Djava.io.tmpdir=/tmp -cp $PICARD_CLASSPATH -j
>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille, on 2020-09-13 08:39:20 +0200:
> the new version (0.7.3) of kaptive[1] fails its autopkgtest:
>
> + kaptive.py -a exact_match.fasta -k
> /usr/share/kaptive/reference_database/Klebsiella_k_locus_primary_reference.gbk
> -o output/test
> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/Bio
Hi,
I've packaged survivor - this is a NEW package which builds
in a clean chroot and is lintian clean with passing autoopkgtests.
My changes are pushed to the team-repo here[1].
SInce this needs to build in the Debug sub-directory instead of the main
directory. I took help
from Steffen's way of
Control: tag -1 reopen
Greetings,
Étienne Mollier, on 2020-09-08 21:10:18 +0200:
> Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-09-07 21:55:45 -0400:
> > Étienne Mollier writes:
> > > Thanks for your work on this topic. I attempted to remove the
> > > patches to address #960756 in Biopython. While the problem is
>
Hi Pierre,
On 13.09.20 11:25, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> Le 11/09/2020 à 15:27, Steffen Möller a écrit :
>> Hello again,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> and the error prevails when minimizing the invocation as to
>>
>>
>> ~/git/med-team/pigx/pigx-scrnaseq$ /usr/bin/java -XX:ParallelGCThreads=1
>> -Xm
Hi Andreas,
I made the modifications that you have suggested.
Not sure about the copyright warning on lintian. I have tried
scan-copyrights and grepping README. No success.
Many thanks!
Best
AndreiR
On 9/12/20 10:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Andrei,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 08:44:40P
;) Thank you for your praise, Nilesh. Should should possibly also
mention that I do not really like what I did and hope for an (official)
easier approach towards it.
@Andreas, leave this one for me to sponsor.
Best,
Steffen
On 13.09.20 14:06, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi,
> I've packaged survivor -
Greetings,
I pulled Biopython 1.78 into Salsa, and tried to make sure the
continuous integration pipeline went to green. The package
seems to be in almost good condition to reach Sid to me. As
always, I am not against a rereading, I wouldn't be surprised to
learn I missed points while proceeding
Uploaded. Some smallish changes - ignore.
A nitty-gritty one - you have already placed a debian-tag, which now
does not point to the exact version that was uploaded to the archive.
Near miss, though.
Thank you for this package and your other efforts in the "Genome
Structure" tab.
Steffen
On 13.
Hi Andreas, hi everyone,
Le 11/09/2020 à 09:08, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I tried to upgrade htsjdk[1] but unfortunately I got some build time
> test errors. It would be great if somebody could have a look.
>
I have looked and tried to build, which succeeded. Then I looked at the
log an
Étienne Mollier writes:
> regression looks still there in version 2.10.0-3, at least on
> arm64 architecture.
How can I reproduce it? AFAICT python-biopython's autopkgtest boils
down to the upstream test suite, which runs fine as part of a build of
revision 15084ca (immediately preceding your p
Étienne Mollier writes:
> My kernel traps a general protection fault in libblast.so during
> tblastn execution:
There's a new upstream release (2.10.1) that might conceivably help
here, but as noted in another thread, the update won't be entirely
trivial -- there's at least one x86ism I'll need
Hi folks,
Just to inform you that I've applied for a new mailing list named
debian-ai, focusing on AI and some related acceleration libraries:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ai/
Which is expected to be the main discussion channel for the deep learning
team (https://salsa.debian.org/deeplearni
Hi Mo,
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-ai/
Great to hear that it is accepted. I am already subscribed.
> Which is expected to be the main discussion channel for the deep learning
> team (https://salsa.debian.org/deeplearning-team) and the ROCm team
> (https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team) sinc
Hi Étienne,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 12:58:41PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > But this seems to be kind of a random failure since unstable as well as
> > arm64 and ppc64el in testing are currently OK[3].
>
> Thanks for the notice, I tried running the test in several
> architectures as well. A
15 matches
Mail list logo
