Actually, I appreciate your forward to this mailing list - it is some
nice food for thought. We may yet have been mostly concerned about
maintainability, less so on specifying fractions of workflows that
complete workflows.
@Gulio, are you are of the --no-install-recommends option to apt-get
inst
Hi Steffen,
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I am aware of the --no-install-recommends
option but currently the bcftools package has the following dependencies:
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.29), libhts3 (>= 1.10), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4), perl:any
Suggests: python, python-numpy, python-matplotlib, texlive-latex
Hi Giulio,
How would you like the idea to have both Perl and Python as recommended
and only leave the latex as suggested? What should then happen is that
we place this as a bug report against bcftools. The maintainer (should)
see(s) this and you will be informed when the upload happened that
impl
Hi Steffen,
Yes, that would be great. I didn't even know there was a three tier of
mandatory/recommended/suggested packages, or I would have suggested the
same solution you proposed to begin with. I am a bit new to this so I would
be happy to help in the way I can if you want to talk me through it
Excellent, please
* get an account on salsa.debian.org and request membership with the
med-team
* find a tutorial on how git works, not to know everything but so you
can distinguish branches from tags
* have a Debian machine (or a cloud/docker instance) with Debian
unstable so you can install b
Hi,
> Any reader of the Debian Med list who wants to spent time to discuss this
> with upstream to save falcon in Debian?
Open issue:
https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON_unzip/issues/160
Regards,
--
Antoni Villalonga
https://friki.cat/
6 matches
Mail list logo
