Hi Everyone,
I had a look at the QA page of prinseq-lite and saw a failure in
the autopkgtest[1]. The prinseq-graphs command is missing two
dependencies, and thus choke on the following test:
prinseq-graphs --version
[1]
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/prinseq-l
Hi Olek,
Olek Wojnar, on 2020-05-16 01:18:32 -0400:
> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 8:13 AM Étienne Mollier
> wrote:
> > No, I meant itp_from_debian_dir, but that's good to know anyway;
> > reportbug's wnpp scan is certainly not the most convenient way
> > of reviewing the existing package list: more t
Hi Étienne,
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 09:53:08AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I had a look at the QA page of prinseq-lite and saw a failure in
> the autopkgtest[1]. The prinseq-graphs command is missing two
> dependencies, and thus choke on the following test:
>
> prinseq-graphs --versio
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-16 11:35:48 +0200:
> I fully agree. BTW, in the debian/TODO you wrote about the missing
> Statistics::PCA. As far as my experience with Perl modules packaging
> reaches its relatively easy to create Perl packages. Do you want to
> take the challenge to enab
Hello,
On Sat, 16 May 2020, 12:56 Étienne Mollier,
wrote:
> Sounds good, I understood they may have some routines for
> converting CPAN entries into Debian packages. Will check with
> them.
There's dh-make-perl tool from similarly named Debian package. In your case
the following should be a g
On Sat, May 16, 2020, 03:55 Étienne Mollier
wrote:
>
> is definitely more convenient and much more responsive. :)
>
> Thank you,
>
You're welcome :)
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
