Here's a version of Debian's SIMD Everywhere patch as a pull request for
MMseqs2 https://github.com/soedinglab/MMseqs2/pull/309
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:15 PM Michael Crusoe
wrote:
> [replying on the debian-med list with permission. Please keep Martin and
> Milot CC'd as they do not subscribe]
>
Hi Andreas,
Le 08/05/2020 à 22:51, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely. This is part of the complementary tasks I was planning to do
>> (my Salsa push of yesterday was only to fix the RC bug). h5ar was not in
>> t
Hi Étienne,
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I fixed another Gcc-10 FTBFS, for the "paml" package this time,
> and took this opportunity to run routine-update.
Thanks a lot.
> Manual pages
> are still missing though. Actually, I have no clue how are
> supposed
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-09 15:01:33 +0200:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > I fixed another Gcc-10 FTBFS, for the "paml" package this time,
> > and took this opportunity to run routine-update.
>
> Thanks a lot.
You're welcome, thanks for the up
Hi,
I've added autopkgtests to cgview. Since the output is an image, I haven't
compared it to a reference - is that alright?
If not, how do we usually test packages like this? I tried running a diff
but that reported the files to be different, even though they were visually
the same.
Please take a
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > IMHO if upstream makes it very hard to be contacted our effort
> > we should do should not be exagerated.
>
> I'm not entirely sure I understood your opinion, but if there
> are more projects requiring a Google Account to contact
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-09 18:44:40 +0200:
> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > > IMHO if upstream makes it very hard to be contacted our effort
> > > we should do should not be exagerated.
> >
> > I'm not entirely sure I understood your opinion, bu
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:27 PM Étienne Mollier
wrote:
> Good day,
>
>
> I have not forwarded the patch for the moment, since reporting
> bugs requires posting in a Google Group that forbids contact
> through email, and I have no Google account for the moment, at
> least none usable to my knowledg
Hi Michael,
Michael Crusoe, on 2020-05-09 19:48:06 +0200:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:27 PM Étienne Mollier
> wrote:
>
> > Good day,
> >
> >
> > I have not forwarded the patch for the moment, since reporting
> > bugs requires posting in a Google Group that forbids contact
> > through email, and I
Hi Pranav,
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 09:54:56PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote:
> I've added autopkgtests to cgview. Since the output is an image, I haven't
> compared it to a reference - is that alright?
Its definitely better than nothing.
> If not, how do we usually test packages like this? I trie
Hi Andreas,
The 3 pipelines nf-core/nanoseq, nf-core/artic, nf-core/viralrecon I
shared are the most applicable (= the highest priority) to COVID-19
analysis. [1].
Now I share the additional 5 pipelines that are certainly relevant (=
the 2nd highest priority). [2]
This is the result of my intervie
Hi,
For once, maybe I can be of some help there. I shall be able to reach the
author of PAML directly... shall I give it a try?
Julien.
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 8:31 PM Étienne Mollier
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Crusoe, on 2020-05-09 19:48:06 +0200:
> > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:27 PM Étien
Hi,
I've added autopkgtests to gasic. Please review and sponsor.
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/gasic/
Regards,
Pranav
ᐧ
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:21 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Pranav,
>
> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 09:54:56PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote:
> > I've added autopkgtests to cgview. Since the output is an image, I
> haven't
> > compared it to a reference - is that alright?
>
> Its definitely
On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 03:17, Pranav Ballaney
wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:21 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> Hi Pranav,
>>
>> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 09:54:56PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote:
>> > I've added autopkgtests to cgview. Since the output is an image, I
>> haven't
>>
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 03:57:50AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >>
> >> autopkgtest [19:32:42]: test run-unit-test: [---
> >> run-detectors: unable to find an interpreter for /usr/bin/cgview
> >> autopkgtest [19:32:43]: test run-unit-test: ---]
> >> autopkgte
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:32:32PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote:
> For once, maybe I can be of some help there. I shall be able to reach the
> author of PAML directly... shall I give it a try?
Yes, please forward the patch - basically in the interest of the PAML
authors themselves.
Kind regar
Hi Pranav,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 02:58:32AM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote:
> I've added autopkgtests to gasic. Please review and sponsor.
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/gasic/
thank you for adding this test. There is one cosmetic issue and a
problematic issue. The cosmetic thing is that t
18 matches
Mail list logo
