Re: [RFS] art-nextgen-simulation-tools

Hi Nilesh, On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > I have fixed art-nextgen-simulation-tools failed tests in debci. > It builds fine in a clean chroot, with passing autopkgtests. > I have pushed my changes to team repo here[1]. > Needs review and sponsorship. > > [1]: http

Re: [RFS] art-nextgen-simulation-tools

On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, 13:55 Andreas Tille, wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:52:37AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > I have fixed art-nextgen-simulation-tools failed tests in debci. > > It builds fine in a clean chroot, with passing autopkgtests. > > I have pushed my changes to tea

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas, I ran loki's tests on my machine in sbuild environment, and I got no errors. As I understand it, the loki.dat file has to exist after "prep" steps. I added an "ls" into the run-unit-test to check this. Also, I turned on the build-time tests that are more or less the same as for the aut

Request for sponsoring changes in idba

Hi, I have added autopkgtests for idba . (Closes #909716 ) I need a few suggestions on how these tests can be improved. 1. The test data can be generated using the sim_reads command that comes with the package, but for

Re: Failure in autopkgtest for loki (Was: Working tests seem to exist for epcr)

Hi Andreas, On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:39 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Pranav, > > I need to admit that your contributions had a high level and its hard to > believe for me that its your first time contributing to open source. > I'm always happy to see competent students in GSoC. > Thank you :)