Re: Where to place cmake files (Was: Help in cmake / itk issue needed)

2015-05-18 Thread Gert Wollny
Hello Andreas, On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 08:47 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > $ apt-file search /usr/share/cmake | wc -l > 3583 > $ apt-file search /usr/lib/cmake | wc -l > 1419 Well, when you look at the package count that provide cmake files, it looks a bit different: apt-file search /usr/shar

Re: Where to place cmake files (Was: Help in cmake / itk issue needed)

2015-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:28:48AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > > I was actually thinking about > > > >git://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/bamtools.git > > > > which I did not yet uploaded since I'm unsure about the "hand-made" > > cmake file in debian/cmake itself, the choice of a subdirector

Re: Where to place cmake files (Was: Help in cmake / itk issue needed)

2015-05-18 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
2015-05-18 11:01 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille : > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:28:48AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > > > I was actually thinking about > > > > > >git://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/bamtools.git > > > > > > which I did not yet uploaded since I'm unsure about the "hand-made" > > > cmake

[MoM] r-cran-fastmatch: last polishing

2015-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Dear Alba, I did some minor changes to your r-cran-fastmatch packaging: 1. cme fix dpkg-control As suggested in Debian Med policy this does some sensible polishing - in this case fixing the canonical VCS fields 2. Removed the Testsuite field from debian/control since there is no te

[MoM] r-cran-nnls: please fix copyright

2015-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Dear Alba, I had a look into your commits for r-cran-nnls. I noticed that there is a file inst/COPYRIGHTS specifying copyright information for the Files: src/*.f Please mention this in a separate paragraph in debian/copyright since otherwise ftpmaster will refuse the package. Moreover I would

Re: [MoM] r-cran-fastmatch: last polishing

2015-05-18 Thread Alba Crespi
Dear Andreas, 2015-05-18 19:58 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille : > Please `gbp pull` to fetch the changes I did. > I've now pulled those changes. > Otherwise the package is fine and thus I uploaded it. Currently new > queue processing is quite slow and thus I can not tell when it will be > accepted i

Re: [MoM] r-cran-nnls: please fix copyright

2015-05-18 Thread Alba Crespi
2015-05-18 20:04 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille : > I had a look into your commits for r-cran-nnls. I noticed that there > is a file inst/COPYRIGHTS specifying copyright information for the > Thanks -- I'd forgotten to add entries for that, but have done it now. > Moreover I would like you to do > >

Re: [MoM] r-cran-nnls: please fix copyright

2015-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alba, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:49:15PM +0100, Alba Crespi wrote: > > I had a look into your commits for r-cran-nnls. I noticed that there > > is a file inst/COPYRIGHTS specifying copyright information for the > > Thanks -- I'd forgotten to add entries for that, but have done it now. Lintia

Re: [MoM] r-cran-nnls: please fix copyright

2015-05-18 Thread Alba Crespi
Hi Andreas, 2015-05-18 21:21 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille : > > A missing Copyright field > >missing-field-in-dep5-copyright > There is no copyright holder, since it's public domain! I can list the author there, but that's not really correct. > Duplicated license names dep5-copyright-license-

Breaking ABI in shlibs (yaml-cpp)

2015-05-18 Thread Paul Novotny
I recently updated yaml-cpp from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2. This caused a bug in a dependent package [1]. It turns out, 0.5.2 is not binary compatible with 0.5.1 (abi-compliance-checker confirms this) and is probably the source of the bug. Does anyone have advice? What should I do to resolve this? Thanks, -P

Re: [MoM] r-cran-nnls: please fix copyright

2015-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alba, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Alba Crespi wrote: > 2015-05-18 21:21 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille : > > > A missing Copyright field > > > >missing-field-in-dep5-copyright > > > > There is no copyright holder, since it's public domain! > > I can list the author there, but that

Re: Breaking ABI in shlibs (yaml-cpp)

2015-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:20:06PM -0400, Paul Novotny wrote: > I recently updated yaml-cpp from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2. This caused a bug in a > dependent package [1]. It turns out, 0.5.2 is not binary compatible with > 0.5.1 (abi-compliance-checker confirms this) and is probably the source > of