Libcolt-free accepted, lets see how far we can get with it (first package: libdsol1-java)

2015-03-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I think after about three years of trying we finally might be able to free those projects depending from libcolt-java. The new libcolt-free-java was created by simply removing the non-free code[2]. So with some luck that this code is not really used (first tests are promising for all packages

Re: SVN -> GIT mass conversion

2015-03-30 Thread Roland Fehrenbacher
> Roland Fehrenbacher writes: Hi Andreas, > "A" == Andreas Tille writes: > Hi Andreas, >> fasttree is a special case I will write a separate mail about >> later. A> I've seen the commits. A> All fine with me - as I said please make sure to remove soonish A> fr

Re: Re: fw4spl's bug reported

2015-03-30 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Hi Andreas, I've just tried to build the fw4spl with the latest changes, and it works very well. I've no answer from the bug reporters, but my changes seem in line with the policy and their comments. Thank you for your help, Best regards, Corentin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-r

Re: Libcolt-free accepted, lets see how far we can get with it (first package: libdsol1-java)

2015-03-30 Thread Michael Crusoe
Great news! Thank you Andreas for your persistence in freeing libcolt. I've added the task of testing with libjung-java with your new package to my list. On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I think after about three years of trying we finally might be able to > free

Re: SVN -> GIT mass conversion

2015-03-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Roland, On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > > done. Please check whether it looks OK. Thanks. I commited some change with We have no documented format for this kind of files but some best practices inside this SVN archive. Adapting to this ... So it i

Re: fw4spl's bug reported

2015-03-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Corentin, On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:44:54PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > I've just tried to build the fw4spl with the latest changes, and it > works very well. > I've no answer from the bug reporters, but my changes seem in line > with the policy and their comments. I'll sponsor the pac

Re: [MoM] dwv

2015-03-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yves, On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:11:55AM +0200, Yves wrote: > Ok, now I get your comment about using Ubuntu for Debian packaging... I'm > trying to setup pbuilder so that it only uses debian sources and not the > ubuntu ones that are in sources.list. For that I modified my .pbuilderrc to: > >

Re: fw4spl's bug reported

2015-03-30 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Ok fine ! Thank you very much. Corentin 2015-03-30 15:32 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > Hi Corentin, > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:44:54PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > > I've just tried to build the fw4spl with the latest changes, and it > > works very well. > > I've no answer from the bug

Re: SVN -> GIT mass conversion

2015-03-30 Thread Roland Fehrenbacher
> "A" == Andreas Tille writes: A> Hi Roland, On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Roland A> Fehrenbacher wrote: >> >> done. Please check whether it looks OK. A> Thanks. I commited some change with A> We have no documented format for this kind of files but som

Re: [MoM] dwv

2015-03-30 Thread Yves
Sorry, meant --create and not --update for pbuilder. After a few try and changing the mirror site, it went through. But git-buildpackage still complains about liborthancclient-dev: "pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: liborthancclient-dev (>= 0.8.6) but it is not going to be installed." I thou

Re: [MoM] dwv

2015-03-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yves, On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:24:27AM +0200, Yves wrote: > Sorry, meant --create and not --update for pbuilder. After a few try and > changing the mirror site, it went through. It would be helpful for others if you would post the final solution here. > But git-buildpackage still > complain