Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging

2013-12-13 Thread L.C. Karssen
Hi Andreas, On 12-12-13 09:32, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:20:39AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >>> Sorry, what is "dquilt" - I only know quilt (without the d in the >>> beginning)? >> >> dquilt is an alias for quilt created in sections 3.1/3.2

Re: Safe Community Conference in Arusha, Tanzania

2013-12-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/12/13 at 15:47 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:43:34PM +0100, Arne Wichmann wrote: > > Ok, this is interesting but problematic. We are a volunteer based > > organization, and as such funding intercontinental flights is difficult. > > I will forward this mail to differ

Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging

2013-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lennart, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:26:52AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote: > >> And drags in a whole bunch of dependencies, wow :-). I agree d/control > >> looks better now. > > > > While it looks better it actually does not drag something additional in > > - just reformatting dependencies to have

Re: Safe Community Conference in Arusha, Tanzania

2013-12-13 Thread Arne Wichmann
begin quotation from Lucas Nussbaum (in <20131213083455.ga30...@xanadu.blop.info>): > On 12/12/13 at 15:47 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:43:34PM +0100, Arne Wichmann wrote: > > > Ok, this is interesting but problematic. We are a volunteer based > > > organization, an

Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging

2013-12-13 Thread L.C. Karssen
Hi Andreas, On 13-12-13 09:38, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > > $ git diff > diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules > index 4ece2fa..970e910 100755 > --- a/debian/rules > +++ b/debian/rules > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ GIT_TAG:= $(subst ~,_,$(VERSION)) > # a

Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging

2013-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lennart, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:24:41AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote: > > At my side even now the test does not pass. Does your current packaging > > build in pbuilder (and are you sure you pushed everything)? > > Ah, my bad. I Ran the wrong pbuilder (Ubuntu). Debian Wheezy doesn't > have th

Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging

2013-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lennart, since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp). There is also the warning about arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 11103kB 91% After having a look into /usr/share/probabel/examples and /usr/sha

Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging

2013-12-13 Thread L.C. Karssen
Hi Andreas, On 13-12-13 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a > good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp). That's good news! I'll do that probably later today. > > There is also the warning abou

Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging

2013-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lennart, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:05:36PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote: > > since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a > > good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp). > > That's good news! I'll do that probably later today. :-) > > There is a

looking for a review for pycorrfit

2013-12-13 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
Hi All, I am looking for a review for my package pycorrfit [0], ITP #730640. Lintian is clear, but I am pretty sure there are hidden issues :) Also I am not sure what to do with png images in doc-src/Images directory. There are svg files as well, but I haven't managed to correctly convert the s

Bug#732082: RM: ugene/experimental -- ROM; Package moves from main to nonfree

2013-12-13 Thread Olivier Sallou
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal We uploaded a new vesion of ugene, which moved to non-free. This created a db integrity error when ftp master accepted the package. I have been asked to create a rm bug to remove the package first before getting it accepted in unstable/non-free. I am co-

Re: looking for a review for pycorrfit

2013-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alex, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:40:07PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > Hi All, > > I am looking for a review for my package pycorrfit [0], ITP #730640. > Lintian is clear, but I am pretty sure there are hidden issues :) Since I have no idea neither data to use this package I'm probably no

bedtools version 2.18.0

2013-12-13 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:33:18PM -0500, Aaron Quinlan a écrit : > > It has been over a year since the last bedtools release, and as such, we are > happy to roll out version 2.18. There are several changes in this new release > and the credit for all of the new (the result of a lot of hard work o

Re: bedtools version 2.18.0

2013-12-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Charles, On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:59:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Personally, I have no problem with this. I also have the feeling that a > couple > of years ago, it would not have been a problem. However, I have the > impression that now it is important for Debian that images ar