On 05/16/2013 09:34 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reassign 708439 libboost1.49-dev
> Bug #708439 [src:autodock-vina] autodock-vina: FTBFS: xtime.hpp:23:5: error:
> expected identifier before numeric constant
> Bug reassigned from pac
Hi Alex,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:13:13PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Should I reassign the Bug#707416: tophat: FTBFS:
>
> as it was done with bugs above ?
>
> Or should I simply close it ?
>
> The problem with tophat is solved with the new libboost1.49-dev.
If its "autofix
Hi,
I want to draw your attention onto an extract of my posting I sended to
Fedora medical SIG mailing list[1].
- Forwarded message from Andreas Tille -
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:07:54 +0200
From: Andreas Tille
To: medical-...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: Last updates
Hi Mario,
Hi everybody,
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
You might like to check this Wiki page for further interesting programs
besides Seg3D[2] and msvtk[3]. I might consider creating a packaging
skeleton if this helps. Any takers for packaging?
shouldn't we begin with an entry in the task
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for your comments.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 05:19:26PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >You might like to check this Wiki page for further interesting programs
> >besides Seg3D[2] and msvtk[3]. I might consider c
Hi Yaroslav,
There was a bug #708557 reported yesterday against aghermann, filed on behalf
of all kfreebsd users. As I now stand accused of discrimination against these
minority arches, I hasten to rectify this with 0.9.0.3, in which I accommodate
the poor souls who have no mremap function in the
On Fri, 17 May 2013, andrei zavada wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
> There was a bug #708557 reported yesterday against aghermann, filed on behalf
> of all kfreebsd users. As I now stand accused of discrimination against these
> minority arches, I hasten to rectify this with 0.9.0.3, in which I accommoda
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > and the build succeeds on kfreebsd-*?
> how would I know? have you tried this one on a kfreebsd?
> to not disturb the archive possibly without a reason then I will try to
> build it first on a local kfreebsd boxy
sorry -- nope -- seems to fail
8 matches
Mail list logo