Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Eric Maeker
Hi, I've updated libquazip to v0.5.1 Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/abbc2abd-6cdb-4a26-bef3-3624d63df...@gmail.com

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eric, thanks for your work. I guess we somehow talked about this but I'm to lazy to seek for this potential past discussion: The dev package does not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should (according to library packaging guide). I somehow have the feeling that not using d-shlibs

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Eric Maeker
Le 18 mars 2013 à 14:11, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Eric, > > thanks for your work. I guess we somehow talked about this but I'm to > lazy to seek for this potential past discussion: The dev package does > not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should (according to > library packagi

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Eric Maeker
>> Hi Eric, >> >> The dev package does not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should Done, tested and committed -> v0.5.1-2 Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eric, On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote: > > I somehow have the feeling that not using > > d-shlibs enabled to simply ignore this part of a lib*-dev package. BTW, > > I removed the d-shlibs stuff which I injected in some early state of > > packaging once but they are