Re: [MoM] CamiTK packaging first part

2013-02-15 Thread Emmanuel Promayon
Hello, About the commit I did yesterday, I wanted to mention two remaining lintian's warning (I forgot them in my joy of having something operational): - camitk source: newer-standards-version 3.9.4 (current is 3.9.3) - libcamitk3 binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames (this one is override

Re: [MoM] CamiTK packaging first part

2013-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:37:53PM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote: > Hello, > > I just committed some changes on the svn corresponding to the first > two points of my plan: > - rtfm (not finished, as I keep finding new things to read or to re-read) > - update upstream source tarball > - generate a

Re: [MoM] CamiTK packaging first part

2013-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emmanuel, On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:09:31AM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote: > Hello, > > About the commit I did yesterday, I wanted to mention two remaining > lintian's warning (I forgot them in my joy of having something > operational): > - camitk source: newer-standards-version 3.9.4 (curre

Re: Python package review

2013-02-15 Thread Diane Trout
> > You does the byte compilation yourself in postinst/prerm, but I think it > > would be better to use provided tools. > > +1 (or should I say +2?) > Dropping in late to a conversation. I'm pretty sure debian byte compiles on install because you don't know which python interpreters are actua

Re: [MoM] Debian Med MoM for February

2013-02-15 Thread Sukhbir Singh
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille wrote: > Sorry for the nitpicking but in case somebody else wants to repeat the > question to upstream it would be very helpful to also provide > > Date: > To: > > fields from your mail. Done. > Yep. Except for the nitpicking the package is ready for upload a

Re: [MoM] Debian Med MoM for February

2013-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:15:23AM -0500, Sukhbir Singh wrote: > I think we are ready! Yes, we are. Upload done. Congratulations to your first package Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: [MoM] Debian Med MoM for February

2013-02-15 Thread Eric Maeker
> Yes, we are. Upload done. > > Congratulations to your first package Great, one more ! Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2b41237f-2e19-44ec-9f4b-4

Re: [MoM] CamiTK packaging first part

2013-02-15 Thread Emmanuel Promayon
Sounds good so far. I have spotted some lintian info which is not dramatically but I stumbled the first time about it (you need `lintian -I`) I: libcamitk3-data: duplicated-compressed-file usr/share/camitk-3.0/testdata/BigEndianCompressed.img.gz N: N: The given, apparently compressed, file is sh

Re: [MoM] CamiTK packaging first part

2013-02-15 Thread Emmanuel Promayon
Thank you Andreas, Feel free to ignore (you need to use lintian from unstable which knows the latest standard-version). Ignoring this is perfectly fine. Ok - libcamitk3 binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames (this one is overriden) That's OK. Good. 1) Concerning the first warning: I

Re: [MoM] CamiTK packaging first part

2013-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:10:01PM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote: > >I've checked that it is just a small file but wanted to make you > >aware about this. > I just asked the developer of the itkimage extension about it. I will > let you know if this is a normal or not (I seemed to remember we need