Re: [MoM] Debian Med MoM for February

2013-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sukhbir, On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:56:27PM -0500, Sukhbir Singh wrote: > I just rebuilt the repository and made the changes. `lintian' output is > clean but the issue with the watch file still remains. Well, it is fine so far - if there is no upstream versioning you have no chance to write a

Re: MIA upload

2013-02-14 Thread Gert Wollny
Hello, since the MIA package is still in the ftp-master pipeline and I'm closing in for a new release that fixes a few issues, I was wondering how I should handle the situation. Should I prepare everything based on the already existing git tree, or should I redo the package from scratch? In sho

Re: MIA upload

2013-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gert, I admit that currently new processing is more or less stalled and I guess that ftpmaster is doing this on purpose to fully concentrate on the next release. Because it is your first package and you are lacking some experience: This is *not* normal and usually the time for new packages unt

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-02-14 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Hi Andreas, On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:25:01PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> I created a branch (beta3) where I'm committing and cherry-picking >> some fixes to beta3. After these commits I update the the tag v3.0-b3. >

Re: Packaging InVesalius

2013-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thiago, On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 04:27:26PM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > I understand. Maybe it's better to wait to the next version. I think > the next is close to be released. Sounds reasonable specifically because it seems that ftpnew is currently not processed - so waiting on our s

[MoM] CamiTK packaging first part

2013-02-14 Thread Emmanuel Promayon
Hello, I just committed some changes on the svn corresponding to the first two points of my plan: - rtfm (not finished, as I keep finding new things to read or to re-read) - update upstream source tarball - generate a separate libqtpropertybrowser package from the source tarball All was going

Re: [MoM] Debian Med MoM for February

2013-02-14 Thread Sukhbir Singh
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille wrote: > 1. Delete the debian/watch file (because it is useless) > 2. Create debian/lintian-overrides to override the lintian warning > and add a short comment refering to an explanation in README.source. > 3. Write debian/README.source file documenting why the

Re: [MoM] Debian Med MoM for February

2013-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:32:56AM -0500, Sukhbir Singh wrote: > > 3. Write debian/README.source file documenting why there is no watch > > file and what you tried to contact the author (for instance insert > > a copy of your mail - at this point you see the advantage to for > > in