Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: > Although GT.M is very flexible when it comes to configuration - it is all > managed with environment variables - configuring directories one way vs. > another can make it easier or harder to manage configurations. Two points > worth noting a

Re: Packaging VistA - next package EWD

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:54:14AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote: > > ... > > Once EWD is available, we will have a very nifty > > environment for developers to work on applications > > that combine a Web based front end, with power > > of VistA

Re: Packaging VistA - next package EWD

On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote: >Should I first report a bug entry for the package ? >[2]http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting >or should I add the files to the SVN debian-med repository first. >I'm planning on adding a directory "ewd". whenever approaching a new package

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

2012/7/14 Luis Ibanez : > Our first rough cut at the directory structure > for the VistA Debian package has been: > > > /var/lib/vista/ > /var/lib/vista/r > /var/lib/vista/o > /var/lib/vista/g > /var/lib/vista/j > /var/lib/vista/logs > /var/lib/vista/inetd > /var/lib/vista/profile (I apologize be

Re: Packaging VistA - next package EWD

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:26:02AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote: > Should I first report a bug entry for the package ? > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > > or should I add the files to the SVN debian-med repository first. > > I'm planning on adding a directory "ewd". In addition to what Yarosl

Re: Packaging VistA - next package EWD

Thanks Yaroslav, On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote: > >Should I first report a bug entry for the package ? > >[2]http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > > >or should I add the files to the SVN debian-med repository fi

Re: Packaging VistA - next package EWD

On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Luis Ibanez wrote: > $> reportbug wnpp > # time to send ITP bugreport to avoid possible duplication of effort >Thanks again for the command. >I just submitted the ITP,... but... >I'm not sure that I did it right, >and that it went through. >Shou

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

Hi, On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:03:51AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote: > > Our first rough cut at the directory structure > for the VistA Debian package has been: I confirm that the questions Nicolas Barbier has asked in his replay to your mail are the same questions which are somehow bothering me as

Re: Starting packaging VistA (Re: LSM in Geneva)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: > > On 07/10/2012 01:05 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > >> Regarding creating a vista user and group: >> >> I don't think it matters at all whether it is overkill or not. >> >> The only thing that matters is whether we've got a clear use case >> f

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I confirm that the questions Nicolas Barbier has asked in his replay to > your mail are the same questions which are somehow bothering me as well > (so I will not repeat these here). > > > /var/lib/vista/ > > /var/lib/vista/r > > /var/lib

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

On 07/14/2012 01:38 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Tille > wrote: I confirm that the questions Nicolas Barbier has asked in his replay to your mail are the same questions which are somehow bothering me as well (so I will no