On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 06:08:43PM -0400, K.S. Bhaskar wrote:
> Andreas, I took your name off the addressee list to avoid duplication.
Thanks.
> [KSB] I agree that we should target Unstable first. Note that the
> bootstrap requires a release of GT.M, not the current release of GT.M
> (agai
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:31:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> This said, other people may be intersted in the draft packages, or even
> volunteer to finish them, so I wonder how much it would make sense to share
> them in a places such as ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/drafts or
> svn://sv
Hello,
On 08/04/2010 09:41 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:31:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> This said, other people may be intersted in the draft packages, or even
>> volunteer to finish them, so I wonder how much it would make sense to share
>> them in a places s
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Andreas once took the effort to move my collection of draft
> packages from a past home page of mine over to to Debian Med,
> and funnily enough this has indeed helped me 5 years later :)
:-)
> > In principle we could drop such a f
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I don't think so. Perhaps I did not made my idea clear enough. While
> "UNRELEASED" in the changelog is just a binary information (released or
> not) I would like to know the reasons *why* the package is not (yet??)
And we have debian/TODO for that as
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:29:43AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> And we have debian/TODO for that as well imho.
I never used this, it might be a reasonable place as well. But we are
actually talking about something the person who started tha packaging
does not want "todo" anything any more.
6 matches
Mail list logo
