Hi Bas,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 04:43:24PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance
> > following Debian Med group policy[1]? BTW, the policy is not fully up
> > to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository.
>
Hi Jakson,
when reinspecting the free software projects which might be interesting
to be packaged as official Debian package for the profit of the Debian
Med project I tried to find out the status of Swarm. At the Swarm
homepage I found a hint to your packaging guide which vanished from the
origi
Hi Scott,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:37:59AM -0700, Scott Christley wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> would you mind contacting upstream about this issue because you are
>> obviousely well informed ?
>
> Yes, will do.
Any news about this? As a reminder you might l
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:02:30PM +0200, Holger Schmuhl wrote:
> I just updated the view (http://www.medfloss.org/node/350) which is now also
> listing the following attributes per project:
Thanks for your work on this and sorry for my silence. I was on
vacation once your mail hitted the list a
Hi Andreas,
I should have a copy of Jakson's files. I was using them to give me hints for
packaging Swarm. The upstream Swarm code has changed significantly so the
packaging needs to be updated. I have the files in my local Debian Med
checkout, so I suppose I should commit them sometime soon
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:50:10PM -0700, Scott Christley wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I should have a copy of Jakson's files. I was using them to give me hints
> for packaging Swarm. The upstream Swarm code has changed significantly so
> the packaging needs to be updated. I have the files in my
Hello Andreas,
Yes, we have received word recently that the few pieces of code under
discussion are to be released under the new Plan 9 (Lucent) license, which
should alleviate the licensing issues for that code. We are waiting for the
author to release new files with the license attached.
Is
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when reinspecting the free software projects which might be interesting
> to be packaged as official Debian package for the profit of the Debian
> Med project I tried to find out the status of Swarm. At the Swarm
> homepage I found a hint to
On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:50:10PM -0700, Scott Christley wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I should have a copy of Jakson's files. I was using them to give me hints
>> for packaging Swarm. The upstream Swarm code has changed significantly so
>>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:40:43PM -0700, Scott Christley wrote:
> Yes, we have received word recently that the few pieces of code under
> discussion are to be released under the new Plan 9 (Lucent) license, which
> should alleviate the licensing issues for that code. We are waiting for the
> a
Hi Jakson,
thanks for your quick response.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:03:28PM -0300, Jakson Alves de Aquino wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have backup of my swarm package. I looked at
> old DVDs but I didn't include the libswarm in them.
That does not seem to be a real problem because Scott
11 matches
Mail list logo
