Re: pdb2pqr maintained by DebiChem team but in Debian Med repository?

2009-12-06 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:59:01PM +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > PDB2PQR also contains embedded copies of code which are not needed at > all. The size might justify repacking. Any opinions on that? In many cases it is a matter of taste. I'm personally in favour of repackaging if it saves certain a

Re: pdb2pqr maintained by DebiChem team but in Debian Med repository?

2009-12-06 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:31:55PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:59:01PM +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > > > And what are the feeling towards the new source format? Is it OK with > > the group to use 3.0 (whatever) or should I leave it at 1.0? > > Why not start using a