Hello,
Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:01:44PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> when touching some packages to add Enhances fields I realised
>> that pdb2pqr is (formally?) maintained by DebiChem team but is
>> sitting in Debian Med repository. I admit I do not mind which
>> actua
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I had a look into Artemis[1] because this might be used in our
> institute. The situation of this package is similar to the recently
> packaged alien_hunter: It contains a lot of Jar files without source.
to have Artemis in Debian would be very nice, indeed. P
> Michael Banck wrote:
> > There are still copyright/license issues to resolve according to Manuel,
> > IIRC.
Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
> I don't know about what the exact status of the copyright issue is. But I know
> Manuel to be at it.
Both of the above i
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 07:37:02PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Both of the above is true. There are currently license issues that have
> to be sorted out. I'm in contact with upstream about that and I we're
> working on it. Due to time constraints on both sides of the line, it's
> not progressing
Le Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 05:14:26PM +0200, Steffen Moeller a écrit :
> As long as the debian/control file indicates where to find the repository,
> which could be any, we should not care.
Exactly: with ‘debcheckout -a’ it makes little difference if a package is in
reposotory A or B, as long as all
5 matches
Mail list logo
