Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2009-10-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, sorry for the full quote but I want to keep Debian Med in the queue. Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance following Debian Med group policy[1]? BTW, the policy is not fully up to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository. To th

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2009-10-15 Thread Karsten Hilbert
IMO both practice and tools seem to fit. Karsten On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:09:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Subject: Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical > timeseries > storage files > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) > > Hi Bas, > > sorry for the full quote

jemboss and artemis

2009-10-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Charles, I had a look into Artemis[1] because this might be used in our institute. The situation of this package is similar to the recently packaged alien_hunter: It contains a lot of Jar files without source. In alien_hunter this was easy to solve: The jars were all available for Debian so I

Re: Bug#551045: ITP: edfbrowser -- a viewer for medical timeseries storage files

2009-10-15 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Andreas! You wrote: > Do you intend to maintain the package under Debian Med group maintenance > following Debian Med group policy[1]? BTW, the policy is not fully up > to date because it does not mention the newly created git repository. Sure, that's fine with me. If you can add me to the

Re: jemboss and artemis

2009-10-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:58:15PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Jar-jungle Hi Andreas, I had a look at Artemis. First (and unrelated to jEmboss), I found a copy of Picard, which in my opinion would desserve an ITP anyway: http://picard.sourceforge.net I am not sure if I am competent to pac