Hi,
after having updated several of our packages I try to target at removal
candidates. When trying to take a screeshot - hey, anybody elso who
wants to support Debian Med by doing screenshots??? - from treetool I
realised that any action freezes my X server. I had to switch to
console and kill
Hi,
I'm an upstream author of BioRuby.
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:56:10 +0200
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, BioRuby was not updated for a long time and nobody complained
> until now. So the upload does not seem to be urgent. But we will have
> a Debian freeze in December (at least this is the plan)
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:10:13PM +0900, Naohisa GOTO wrote:
> I'm an upstream author of BioRuby.
Thanks for contacting Debian Med about this.
> There were a complain in BioRuby mailing list.
> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioruby/2009-April/000893.html
So this would give one more point
Hi,
locking at
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/axparafit
David has finished the package which closes #463219 and changelog says
"Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:52:11 +0100". But there is no visible sign of
this package. If there is nothing I might have overlooked I would
u
Le Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> the Debian Med team has packaged melting for Debian - at least the
> versions < 5. We now are considering to package the latest version and
Dear Nicolas and Marine,
I would like to add to what Andreas already wrote that we e
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:11:10 +0200
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:10:13PM +0900, Naohisa GOTO wrote:
> > I'm an upstream author of BioRuby.
>
> Thanks for contacting Debian Med about this.
>
> > There were a complain in BioRuby mailing list.
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/pipe
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:05:59PM +0900, Naohisa GOTO wrote:
> Yes. I'm also a debian user, and I'm glad if I can help.
Ahh, that's really great. One word beforehand and to everybody (perhaps
I'll compose a separate mail as well): Please install the package
popularity-contest and answer the ques
Hi Rafael,
your package praat was included in the Psychology task of the Debian Med
Blend[1]. I realised that the packaged version is some minor versions
behind upstream (Debian has 5.1.7, upstream has 5.1.17). I wonder whether
this has some technical reason or whether you might struggle with ot
Sorry for answering my own mail:
An alternative option for team maintenance might be
Experimental Psychology Maintainers
for sure - but this team might comment on this themselves.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:54:54PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Sorry for answering my own mail:
>
> An alternative option for team maintenance might be
>
>Experimental Psychology Maintainers
>
>
> for sure - but this team might comment on this themselves.
If there is need for a
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:29:02AM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Sorry for answering my own mail:
> >
> > An alternative option for team maintenance might be
> >
> >Experimental Psychology Maintainers
> >
> >
> >
Hi David,
once you provided a patch which solves this problem. Unfortunately I'm
not positively sure, how to apply this. Would you mind injecting it into
the just updated packaging to let us finish the kalign packaging and fix
all open bugs?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:52:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> once you provided a patch which solves this problem. Unfortunately I'm
> not positively sure, how to apply this. Would you mind injecting it into
> the just updated packaging to let us finish the kalign packaging and fix
> all open
Le Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> after having updated several of our packages I try to target at removal
> candidates. When trying to take a screeshot - hey, anybody elso who
> wants to support Debian Med by doing screenshots??? - from treetool I
> realised th
user debian-le...@lists.debian.org
usetags 548719 copyright-review-requested
thanks
Dear all,
in order to lower our rejection rate from the new queue, I propose to do more
systematically peer-review of Debian copyright files before the upload of new
packages. I proposed a method in the following
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:40:23PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> But I am all for removing treetool.
OK.
> With NJplot being a bit superseded by the lastest SeaView, that unfortunately
> non-free now, and TreeView X being in difficulty because it does not compile
> with latest wxwidgets, we may
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 02:20:13PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Could anybody have a look at its Debian copyright file? In exchange, I will
> review dicomscope.
I had a look and do not have any additions regarding the content.
However I'm curious about the formatting. If the copyright informati
17 matches
Mail list logo
