On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> In the first experiment, I inserted a line containing "Format: 2.0" on
Clearly the format 2.0 has been implemented as an academic exercise
because we're speaking of wig&pen since so long... but it's not the format
that I want to push for wide adoption.
Hi again,
Le Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:08:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Clearly the format 2.0 has been implemented as an academic exercise
Then please do not ask for feedback on it. I am happy to spend time for
you but not if it is to be wa
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Clearly the format 2.0 has been implemented as an academic exercise
>
> Then please do not ask for feedback on it. I am happy to spend time for
> you but not if it is to be wasted.
My initial mail was clear: "In particular I want feedback on the "3.0
On Sonntag 30 März 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > for the time beeing could you please investigate if a
> > pseudo-package for openoffice-pyuno on arm can be provided.
>
> This is no task for Debian-Med but for the Openoffice people. Moreover
> I do not really understand your problem. The missi
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:25:37PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would have nothing against moving to git, except that I would be
> unhappy to hear six month later than mercurial or bazaar is better and
> that we should change again.
>
> This said, I think that we will have to do some ground w
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:01:10PM +0100, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
> [...] The problem here is not really
> subversion, but svn-buildpackage, which encourages storing only the
> debian dir.
That's not something you can pin directly on svn-buildpackage. In
principle, there's nothing stopping one from
Hi,
I recently learned that file has obviosely no means for detecting biological
data formats. Three months ago we had some discussions about Applied
Biosystems chromatograms[1]. This thread more or less had ended with: We
are waiting for an answer of the authors.
Now I wonder whether we could
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
If I can be permitted a naive question: is Debian-Med restricted to a
single VCS for some reason?
I do not regard this question as naive and the answer is definitely _no_.
Last week I wrote a mail about this to Debian-Med list and DebiChem list
in C
8 matches
Mail list logo
