NMU though, so I just uploaded it. If everything goes well, in 5
> days libquazip should be good to go into stretch, then.
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
gt;
> I agree. As Mattia said, only marble is left and the maintainer said
> he'd update it soon, so we should be good.
So, today I pinged the marble maintainer again, and he told me he's
working on the new upstream release, that it would have gone to
experimental through NEW, so t
On 19-01-16 11:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:50:43PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> If you ask me we can deal with this without bothering the release team
>>> who might save their time for more important stuff. Anybody who
>>> disagrees is free to stri
further need to bother release team about this. Do you
> agree?
I tried to have a look at libquazip the other day
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libquazip.html
The only missing piace is marble, which needs source changes.
I got in contact with marble's maintainer, who told
Hi Bas,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:50:43PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > If you ask me we can deal with this without bothering the release team
> > who might save their time for more important stuff. Anybody who
> > disagrees is free to strictly follow the Transition wiki literally and
Hi Andreas,
On 10-01-16 17:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 01:49:35PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Please consider coordinating this transition with the Release Team
>> despite it being small, by filing the transition bugreport as documented
>> in the Wiki:
>>
>> http
Hi Bas,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 01:49:35PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> To help out with the libquazip transition I've updated merkaartor to use
> libquazip5-dev instead of libquazip-qt5-dev.
>
> I've also filed bugreports with patches for the other reverse
Hi,
To help out with the libquazip transition I've updated merkaartor to use
libquazip5-dev instead of libquazip-qt5-dev.
I've also filed bugreports with patches for the other reverse
dependencies. These bugreport can be found via the usertag:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgrepo
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:40:49AM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> U've updated the libquazip package:
> - -dbg are created
> - unit-tests are included in the build process for each Qt version
+1
I'm very in favour about testing whereever possibl
Hi Andreas,
U've updated the libquazip package:
- -dbg are created
- unit-tests are included in the build process for each Qt version
- some cosmetics (using patches)
- lintian does only return this warning (that I missed in your previous
mail):
>>> W: libquazip1-qt5: package-nam
Hi Eric,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:48:16PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
>
> Well, the full story is that I was an admin of this software between
> 2005 and 2008. You can see my contribution to this project on the
> Adullact web site[1].
>
> We had a strong difference of opinion between the mixture
Le 15/07/2014 09:19, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>>> > > PS: It's a shame we did not met at LSM. :-(
>> >
>> > Ah yes, excuse me, I have tooo much work... Did you get in touch
>> > with Jérôme. He is new in our community and very smart.
>> >
>> > What did you think about our presentation?
> I lik
e this as default.
>
> Well, mentors told me that Qt4 is the default Debian version. So
> packages should not have to marked with -qt4 in opposition with -qt5
> package. But you are right, I should ask twice ;)
Perhaps there is no need to ask if mentors told you qt4 is default - I
just
> Many thanks for working on this. I can confirm the package builds but has
> some lintian issues.
Ah... Oh yes I forgot to add the lintian param.
> $ lintian libquazip_0.6.2-1_amd64.changes
> I: libquazip source: duplicate-short-description libquazip1 libquazip1-qt5
> I: l
k a
> build @home please ;)
> The last commit is a real bomb ! 5 hours of work to get a dual Qt build !
Many thanks for working on this. I can confirm the package builds but has
some lintian issues.
$ lintian libquazip_0.6.2-1_amd64.changes
I: libquazip source: duplicate-short-description l
>> I still have to manage the dual Qt version inside Debian: Qt4/Qt5. I'm
>> in touch with debian mentors.
>
> Hmmm, does this mean: "Andreas please upload" or "Andreas please wait
> until debian mentors has respondet"?
Ah ah ! It means : Andreas, the work is almost done, can you check a
build @h
Hi Mentors,
I've updated the libquazip package so that it builds a dual qt version
of the library: Qt4 and Qt5. I still have to include the -dbg package
may be using override_dh_strip (it's in progress).
The source package builds without any error with a debian sid pbuilder
base
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 05:10:31PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Le 16/06/2014 11:50, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > E: libquazip-doc: privacy-breach-logo
> > usr/share/doc/libquazip-doc/html/index.html
> > W: libquazip0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libquazip1
>
>
Le 16/06/2014 11:50, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> E: libquazip-doc: privacy-breach-logo
> usr/share/doc/libquazip-doc/html/index.html
> W: libquazip0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libquazip1
The debian package is now corrected.
I still have to manage the dual Qt version inside Debian
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote:
> > I somehow have the feeling that not using
> > d-shlibs enabled to simply ignore this part of a lib*-dev package. BTW,
> > I removed the d-shlibs stuff which I injected in some early state of
> > packaging once but they are
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> The dev package does not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should
Done, tested and committed -> v0.5.1-2
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:
Le 18 mars 2013 à 14:11, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
> thanks for your work. I guess we somehow talked about this but I'm to
> lazy to seek for this potential past discussion: The dev package does
> not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should (according to
> library packagi
d the libquazip.a static
library please document the reasons in README.Debian to let me remember
in the future.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:14:33PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated libquazip to v0.5.1
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hi,
I've updated libquazip to v0.5.1
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/abbc2abd-6cdb-4a26-bef3-3624d63df...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:22:21PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Svn commited 0.5.0 (tested)
Thanks. Uploaded with some nitpicking changes.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Svn commited 0.5.0 (tested)
Eric
2012/12/18 Eric Maeker :
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on the libquazip package to upgrade it to the new 0.5.0 upstream.
> The watch file needs an update as the schema is
>
> when version ends with .0 -> remove it
>
> actually the
Hi,
I'm working on the libquazip package to upgrade it to the new 0.5.0 upstream.
The watch file needs an update as the schema is
when version ends with .0 -> remove it
actually the watchfile contains
http://sf.net/quazip/quazip-(.+)\.(?:tar\.gz)
but how can I remove the .0,
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 02:18:17PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'll update the debian files for the libquazip, there is a new version
> 0.5.0.
I can not find the change in SVN. Forgot to commit?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
-
Hi all,
I'll update the debian files for the libquazip, there is a new version
0.5.0.
Eric
--tmpdir for the static lib and a beautifull
> cp in the install override.
No problem.
> > Please reread the second paragraph for what kind of libraries this would
> > be usally done. IMHO it is a total waste of time to do it for leaf
> > packages like this. Libquazip is far
bg package.
>
> There are no mandatory rules for this kind of package, but a "best practice"
> rule (6.7.9) [1].
> I think this will be appreciate by devs and users of libquazip.
Please reread the second paragraph for what kind of libraries this would
be usally done. IMHO it is
Hi,
Checked the packaging on launchpad. 0.4.4-2 is ready to upload.
Can someone please upload this new revision ?
Thanks
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.deb
>> PS: I can not get the symbols file included in the package. I'm going deeper
>> in docs.
>
> Not that this is of severity "I" = Info. Your previous attempt to solve
> this ended up in a lintian Error - that's why I deactivated this file.
>
> From my perspective there is no real preasure to sol
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:39:00PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Today some small corrections based on the lintian warnings
>
>
> http://lintian.debian.org/full/debian-...@lists.debian.org.html#libquazip
>
> I've used dh_installchangelogs to install the upstream '
Hi,
Today some small corrections based on the lintian warnings
http://lintian.debian.org/full/debian-...@lists.debian.org.html#libquazip
I've used dh_installchangelogs to install the upstream 'NEW' file. But I've
some doubt, shouldn't I use dh_installdocs
Hi,
I've discussed with upstream and we selected the list of symbols to keep for
the ABI/API.
It is uploaded to the svn.
I didn't test it.
Eric
PGP.sig
Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP
>> I believe we can try a first upload of the package?
>
> Done. Let's see how long it might stay in new - perhaps we could base
> the next FreeMedForms package on it. The cool thing is that this
> package was actually the first we uploaded in a MoM effort. Thanks for
> working on this successfu
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 06:08:01PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Ok go for it ;)
>
> Well, I mean *if* I were in your shoes I would ask on debian-mentors. :-)
> My task as mentor is to teach you the channels which might be helpfull not
> to dive into them myself. :-P
I just notice that you inte
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 04:54:54PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> > I have to admit that I do not feel really competent for this question.
> > If I were you I would foreward this question to the debian-mentors list.
>
> Ok go for it ;)
Well, I mean *if* I were in your shoes I would ask on debian-men
2012/6/24 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Eric,
>
> I have to admit that I do not feel really competent for this question.
> If I were you I would foreward this question to the debian-mentors list.
Ok go for it ;)
There are just two "todos" now:
- dh_linktree for JS in documentation
- multiarch
I believe w
Hi all,
I'm working on the packaging of libquazip (c++/Qt wrapper to
ZIP/UNZIP). The packaging is done in the Debian Med team and available
at
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/libquazip/trunk/
The libquazip, libquazip-dev and the libquazip-dbg are correctly cr
- created a symbol file with these commands:
>
> svn-buildpackage --svn-download-orig --svn-ignore --svn-dont-clean
> --svn-reuse --svn-dont-purge
> cd ../build-area/libquazip-0.4.4
> dpkg-gensymbols -plibquazip0 -Osymbols -v0.4.4 -t -V
>
> -> see atta
2012/6/24 Eric Maeker :
> Hi,
>
> Some new work:
> - massive simplication of the rules file using
> * --buildsystem=qmake_qt4
> * --dbg-package=libquazip0-dbg
> * removing the qmake command (overriden by the dh_autoconfigure)
Note:
-> using qmake_qt4 buildsystem (requires debhelper >= 8.9.1)
E
ymbol file with these commands:
svn-buildpackage --svn-download-orig --svn-ignore --svn-dont-clean
--svn-reuse --svn-dont-purge
cd ../build-area/libquazip-0.4.4
dpkg-gensymbols -plibquazip0 -Osymbols -v0.4.4 -t -V
-> see attached file
I'm guessing a probl
Today's work: creating a ppa for QuaZIP.
https://launchpad.net/~freemedforms/+archive/libquazip/+packages
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://l
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:45:54PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Excuse me Andreas, but I do not understand what is the exact meaning
> of th lintian warning on copyright ?
No reason to excuse ...
> I: libquazip source: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
> bsd-3-clause (
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:06:33PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> W: libquazip-doc: embedded-javascript-library
> usr/share/doc/libquazip-doc/html/jquery.js
>
> dh_linktree should do the job but I can find any doc...
man dh_linktree
You can also use the example of gnumed-client doc pa
Another warning
W: libquazip-doc: embedded-javascript-library
usr/share/doc/libquazip-doc/html/jquery.js
dh_linktree should do the job but I can find any doc...
2012/6/7 Eric Maeker :
> Excuse me Andreas, but I do not understand what is the exact meaning
> of th lintian warning on cop
Excuse me Andreas, but I do not understand what is the exact meaning
of th lintian warning on copyright ?
I: libquazip source: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
bsd-3-clause (paragraph at line 26)
??
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
was very easy - without loosing our historic).
I admit that having Git upstream specifically if you are upstream
yourself makes most probably a good reason to switch FreeMedForms
packaging to Git as well. However, I do not see a direct connection to
libquazip (except if you personally would like to
The debug package is wrong. Need to read more docs...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caj_xb5cspauo8_8apyynenia-_wudajrdk-pa77woo+t4xc...@mail.gmail.com
Le 6 juin 2012 à 22:22, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:15:35PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
>> One more todo:
>> - move libquazip from svn to git
>> - (and then do the same for freemedforms but that's not linked to the MoM)
>
> Are you sure?
&g
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:15:35PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> One more todo:
> - move libquazip from svn to git
> - (and then do the same for freemedforms but that's not linked to the MoM)
Are you sure?
Before you move around things please give some reasons for doing so. I
do
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:14:12PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> >>
> >> Not that easy ;) Gone too fast: "comme d'habituuuûddeuuuhh"
> >
> > Well, my intention was to inject a file 'libquazip-doc.docs'
>
> Ah ?
> The
One more todo:
- move libquazip from svn to git
- (and then do the same for freemedforms but that's not linked to the MoM)
Go lintian
Eric
PGP.sig
Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP
Le 6 juin 2012 à 21:54, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 08:51:54PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
>>> man dh_installdocs
>>
>> Not that easy ;) Gone too fast: "comme d'habituuuûddeuuuhh"
>
> Well, my intention was to
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 08:51:54PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> >man dh_installdocs
>
> Not that easy ;) Gone too fast: "comme d'habituuuûddeuuuhh"
Well, my intention was to inject a file 'libquazip-doc.docs' and just
named it &#x
rther hint:
>
>man dh_installdocs
Not that easy ;) Gone too fast: "comme d'habituuuûddeuuuhh"
>> - created entry for the libquazip-dbg in the control file && created the
>> related .install file
>> * debug libs are installed in: /usr/lib/de
ght do as well) or the lot
of lintian warnings? Further hint:
man dh_installdocs
> - created entry for the libquazip-dbg in the control file && created the
> related .install file
> * debug libs are installed in: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libquazip*.so*
As I said I did not
Hi,
Short summary of my today's commits:
- corrected the -doc package :) (too easy)
- created entry for the libquazip-dbg in the control file && created the
related .install file
* debug libs are installed in: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libquazip*.so*
- updated rules:
* adding
t some (more or less) working examples
in our SVN. You know how to seek in our SVN? Here we are:
$ grep -l d-shlibmove trunk/packages/*/trunk/debian/rules
trunk/packages/ctapimkt/trunk/debian/rules
trunk/packages/libgenome/trunk/debian/rules
trunk/packages/libmems/trunk/debian/rules
trunk/pack
Hi Andreas,
I took the liberty to start a new thread for th MoM libquazip.
2012/6/4 Andreas Tille :
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:51:13PM +0200, Eric MAEKER wrote:
>> We have two "natural" ways to build the source and create the package:
>> - the upstream natural way is
62 matches
Mail list logo
