Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-13 Thread merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2020-05-13 22:07, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Definitely, I opened an issue in what looks like the current > source code repository: > > https://github.com/guoyanzhao/VirusSeeker-Virome/issues/10 Looks good! Best, Andrius signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-13 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andrius, mer...@debian.org, on 2020-05-13 12:02:29 +0300: > On 2020-05-08 00:24, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > Thank you for your thoughts, even if I'm a bit late. Reading > > through the script, even using environment variables, there is > > a quite big share of hard-coded paths, so would probab

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-13 Thread merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2020-05-08 00:24, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Thank you for your thoughts, even if I'm a bit late. Reading > through the script, even using environment variables, there is > a quite big share of hard-coded paths, so would probably attempt > to contact upstream in any case. Contacting

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies

2020-05-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:50:45AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > For what it's worth, failing to locate a genuine contact > address related to RepeatMasker, I sent a request through the > "Submit Feedback" form to review the licensing terms, in hope > this helps. Thanks a lot. As I tried to

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies

2020-05-08 Thread Étienne Mollier
Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-08 10:02:22 +0200: > I kept on pinging (feel free to browse the archive) and we should really > do more work here. I repeatedly said now is the time for this and that > non-programmers could do some extremely valuable contribution to join > this effort. Hi Andreas, For

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:19:59AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > their license. Would you mind doing so? If yes, I would consider > > mentioning our COVID-19 sprint and that a free license would support > > us in our fight against the pandemic. > > Hi all, > > +1 in principle, but I note tha

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-08 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Everyone, Charles Plessy, on 2020-05-08 09:19:59 +0900: > > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:24:00PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > > > > > At some point, I wondered if it would be possible to get > > > RepeatMasker into "non-free", and having VirusSeeker into > > > "contrib" then, but I'm not su

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-07 Thread Charles Plessy
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:24:00PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > > > At some point, I wondered if it would be possible to get > > RepeatMasker into "non-free", and having VirusSeeker into > > "contrib" then, but I'm not sure that this is legally doable > > since VirusSeeker is GPL. Le Thu,

Re: VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:24:00PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I've been quietly chiseling the packaging of virusseeker-virome, > but I missed the proper RepeatMasker dependency in the initial > list; Debian provides a few packages related to that software, > and I mistakenly thoug

VirusSeeker: RepeatMasker missed in dependencies (Was: VirusSeeker - sorting the Downloads section)

2020-05-07 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Everyone, I've been quietly chiseling the packaging of virusseeker-virome, but I missed the proper RepeatMasker dependency in the initial list; Debian provides a few packages related to that software, and I mistakenly thought it was available already. For reference, it is the software availabl