Re: Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

2013-05-21 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Joost van Baal-Ilić [2013-05-22 00:07]: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:29:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:39:11AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: I forgot to say two things: 1) I reverted my previous changes in Git regarding the linking against the native GSL lib

Re: Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

2013-05-21 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Hi, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:29:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:39:11AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > I forgot to say two things: > > > > 1) I reverted my previous changes in Git regarding the linking > > against the native GSL library. The version in HEAD

Re: Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

2013-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rafael, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:39:11AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > I forgot to say two things: > > 1) I reverted my previous changes in Git regarding the linking > against the native GSL library. The version in HEAD uses now the > GSL sources shipped in the pristine tarball, since

Re: Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

2013-04-22 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
I forgot to say two things: 1) I reverted my previous changes in Git regarding the linking against the native GSL library. The version in HEAD uses now the GSL sources shipped in the pristine tarball, since this is the desire of the upstream author. 2) The git-dch command was generating a q

Upload of praat 5.3.46-1

2013-04-22 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Hi Andreas, As you probably noticed, I have prepared the praat package in the Git repository for the new upstream release 5.3.46. Since wheezy is almost out of the door, I merged the experimental branch into the master branch. BTW, there was no real need for creating the experimental branch a