Étienne Mollier, on 2021-03-19 19:10:08 +0100:
> Already discussed rapidly on the chat, but for people following
> on the mailing list: this particular test is different from the
> previous bug reports. The key option to reproduce this is the
> flag "--fail-on-broken-symlinks", which is not set by
Nilesh Patra, on 2021-03-19 23:19:40 +0530:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 23:07, Étienne Mollier
> wrote:
> > Nilesh Patra, on 2021-03-19 21:15:35 +0530:
> > > radiant upgrade from buster seems to have a broken symlink as reported
> > > in #985523. I tried fixing this with hints from previous scripts,
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 23:07, Étienne Mollier
wrote:
> Hi Nilesh,
>
> Nilesh Patra, on 2021-03-19 21:15:35 +0530:
> > radiant upgrade from buster seems to have a broken symlink as reported
> > in #985523. I tried fixing this with hints from previous scripts, and
> > taking a look at dpkg's m
Hi Nilesh,
Nilesh Patra, on 2021-03-19 21:15:35 +0530:
> radiant upgrade from buster seems to have a broken symlink as reported
> in #985523. I tried fixing this with hints from previous scripts, and
> taking a look at dpkg's maintscripts manpage.
>
> However, I'm not sure if these fixes are righ
Hi,
radiant upgrade from buster seems to have a broken symlink as reported
in #985523. I tried fixing this with hints from previous scripts, and
taking a look at dpkg's maintscripts manpage.
However, I'm not sure if these fixes are right. Please consider to
review and upload, or give me a green s
5 matches
Mail list logo
