Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-18 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
> > does any of the existing plugins show how to add a REST API > > call to Orthanc when loaded ? > > Ah, I see: Samples/Basic/... > :-) Yes, and you can also check the following official plugins to have more complete sample code: http://www.orthanc-server.com/static.php?page=web-viewer http://w

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-18 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:54:28PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > > submit_wl_entry_file > > > remove_wl_entry_file > > does any of the existing plugins show how to add a REST API > call to Orthanc when loaded ? Ah, I see: Samples/Basic/... :-) Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-18 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:49:59AM +0100, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > > first of all: I don't expect you to work on all this, much > > less _now_. > > > > I am mainly asking to further my own understanding and to > > assess what I can do or what I need to find someone to do. > > > Ah, I see. So,

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-18 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
Hi, > first of all: I don't expect you to work on all this, much > less _now_. > > I am mainly asking to further my own understanding and to > assess what I can do or what I need to find someone to do. OK ;) > Ah, I see. So, assuming there _would_ be two REST calls > > submit_wl_entry_f

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-16 Thread Karsten Hilbert
Hi Sébastien, first of all: I don't expect you to work on all this, much less _now_. I am mainly asking to further my own understanding and to assess what I can do or what I need to find someone to do. > > > Yes. The only problem would be to remove the worklist once > > > the device has uploaded

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-15 Thread Michael Onken
Hi, On 15.01.2016 10:00, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: >> There's a standard DICOM way of saying "remove this worklist entry" >> (regardless of whether it is completed). > > This process is typically done by sending HL7 messages, not through > DICOM messages. > > Maybe the N-DELETE from DICOM "norma

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-15 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
> > Yes. The only problem would be to remove the worklist once > > the device has uploaded its acquisition to Orthanc > > How does that happen _now_ with the current ModalityWorkList > plugin ? (without regard to anything I said would be useful > from a GNUmed point of view) The current plugin wi

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-14 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:46:20PM +0100, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > > If so I was wondering whether the ModalityWorkList plugin > > could be extended with one REST API call which would allow > > external applications to add *.wl worklist item files over > > the network rather than having to store

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-14 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
> When the ModalityWorkList plugin is loaded the Orthanc server > gains the following capabilities: > > - watch a given path for files (which represent worklist entries in > DICOM > format) > - when queried appropriately, return answers based on those files > > Is that correct

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-14 Thread Karsten Hilbert
Hello Sébastien, On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:00:55PM +0100, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > > > 1) Are you planning to provide something like this (pseudocode): > > > > > > curl PUT > > > SERVER:worklist/WORLIST_NAME/worklist_file?data=data_of_worklist_file.wl > > > > > > That way, external soft

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-14 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
Hello Karsten, > > I have got two questions regarding this plugin: > > > > 1) Are you planning to provide something like this (pseudocode): > > > > curl PUT > > SERVER:worklist/WORLIST_NAME/worklist_file?data=data_of_worklist_file.wl > > > > That way, external software (like GNUmed)

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-14 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:34:12AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > Orthanc can serve DICOM worklists through its > > "ModalityWorklists" official plugin [4], in a similar fashion > > than DCMTK's wlmscpfs. This plugin is available in the > > Orthanc official distribution, and is installed with t

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-14 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:22:49AM +0100, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: >>> I didn't figure out whether I can create a worklist. > > Orthanc can serve DICOM worklists through its > "ModalityWorklists" official plugin [4], in a similar fashion > than DCMTK's wlmscpfs. This plugin is available in the > O

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-13 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Am 13.01.2016 um 08:16 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Michael, > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 06:45:00PM -0500, Michael Onken wrote: >>> What I would like to do: [typical imaging workflow] >> >> This can indeed be covered by Open Source tools. One well-known Open >> Source DICOM toolkit is DCMTK [1] whi

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-13 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Hilbert, Sebastian wrote: > > I write you as the author of Orthanc [1] that you mentioned in your > > question. > > > > What I would like to do: [typical imaging workflow] > > > > Just to let you know. GNUmed [1] makes extensive use of the Orthanc REST AP

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-13 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
Am Wednesday 13 January 2016, 09:22:49 schrieb Sébastien Jodogne: > Hello Sebastian, > > I write you as the author of Orthanc [1] that you mentioned in your > question. > > > What I would like to do: [typical imaging workflow] > > Just to let you know. GNUmed [1] makes extensive use of the Orthan

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-13 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
Hello Sebastian, I write you as the author of Orthanc [1] that you mentioned in your question. > > What I would like to do: [typical imaging workflow] > > This can indeed be covered by Open Source tools. One well-known Open > Source DICOM toolkit is DCMTK which is developed in Germany. [...] >

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Michael, On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 06:45:00PM -0500, Michael Onken wrote: > > What I would like to do: [typical imaging workflow] > > This can indeed be covered by Open Source tools. One well-known Open > Source DICOM toolkit is DCMTK [1] which is developed in Germany. Since I > am one the devel

Re: understanding DICOM workflow

2016-01-12 Thread Michael Onken
Hi Sebastian, > What I would like to do: [typical imaging workflow] This can indeed be covered by Open Source tools. One well-known Open Source DICOM toolkit is DCMTK [1] which is developed in Germany. Since I am one the developers, I focus on these (and I am biased;). Of course there are other (