Re: trinityrnaseq ready for review!!

2016-01-29 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:54:52PM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > Oh, I was still doing my file-by-file review. I guess I'll be extra ready > when the reject comes? :-) Ahhh. Well. hope the reject might come next weekend when we sit behind a hopefully faster line... See you Andreas. --

Re: trinityrnaseq ready for review!!

2016-01-29 Thread Michael Crusoe
Oh, I was still doing my file-by-file review. I guess I'll be extra ready when the reject comes? :-) On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:18 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Uploaded (my upload cable is glowing ;-)). Thanks for your work on this. > Andreas. > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:26:58PM +, Michael

Re: trinityrnaseq ready for review!!

2016-01-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Uploaded (my upload cable is glowing ;-)). Thanks for your work on this. Andreas. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:26:58PM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 2:36 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:00:05PM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > >

Re: trinityrnaseq ready for review!!

2016-01-29 Thread Michael Crusoe
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 2:36 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:00:05PM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > > All that is left is two spelling corrections > > Sometimes I just report this upstream and ignore it for the package ... > Done > > and a mysterious harden

Re: trinityrnaseq ready for review!!

2016-01-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Michael, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:00:05PM +, Michael Crusoe wrote: > Now that libjung-free-java has been accepted I've updated the trinityrnaseq > package :-) > The tests again pass, this has been tested in a debci virtual machine. Sounds good. > All that is left is two spelling corr