Re: libquazip transition

2016-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:10:35PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > So, today I pinged the marble maintainer again, and he told me he's > working on the new upstream release, that it would have gone to > experimental through NEW, so totally useless for this case. He acked a > 0-day NMU though, so I

Re: libquazip transition

2016-01-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:57:15PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 19-01-16 11:28, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:50:43PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >>> If you ask me we can deal with this without bothering the release team > >>> who might save their time fo

Re: libquazip transition

2016-01-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 19-01-16 11:28, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Bas, > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:50:43PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> If you ask me we can deal with this without bothering the release team >>> who might save their time for more important stuff. Anybody who >>> disagrees is free to stri

Re: libquazip transition

2016-01-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Since the important (as you said in your mail even serious) bugs are now > resolved according to > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libquazip5-dev;users=sebas...@debian.org > I do not see any further need to bot

Re: libquazip transition

2016-01-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:50:43PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > If you ask me we can deal with this without bothering the release team > > who might save their time for more important stuff. Anybody who > > disagrees is free to strictly follow the Transition wiki literally and

Re: libquazip transition

2016-01-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Andreas, On 10-01-16 17:51, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 01:49:35PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Please consider coordinating this transition with the Release Team >> despite it being small, by filing the transition bugreport as documented >> in the Wiki: >> >> http

Re: libquazip transition

2016-01-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 01:49:35PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > To help out with the libquazip transition I've updated merkaartor to use > libquazip5-dev instead of libquazip-qt5-dev. > > I've also filed bugreports with patches for the other reverse > dependencies. These bugrepor

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eric, On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote: > > I somehow have the feeling that not using > > d-shlibs enabled to simply ignore this part of a lib*-dev package. BTW, > > I removed the d-shlibs stuff which I injected in some early state of > > packaging once but they are

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Eric Maeker
>> Hi Eric, >> >> The dev package does not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should Done, tested and committed -> v0.5.1-2 Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Eric Maeker
Le 18 mars 2013 à 14:11, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Eric, > > thanks for your work. I guess we somehow talked about this but I'm to > lazy to seek for this potential past discussion: The dev package does > not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should (according to > library packagi

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eric, thanks for your work. I guess we somehow talked about this but I'm to lazy to seek for this potential past discussion: The dev package does not contain a static library libquazip.a but it should (according to library packaging guide). I somehow have the feeling that not using d-shlibs

Re: libquazip

2013-03-18 Thread Eric Maeker
Hi, I've updated libquazip to v0.5.1 Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/abbc2abd-6cdb-4a26-bef3-3624d63df...@gmail.com

Re: libquazip 0.5.0

2012-12-18 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:22:21PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote: > Svn commited 0.5.0 (tested) Thanks. Uploaded with some nitpicking changes. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: libquazip 0.5.0

2012-12-18 Thread Eric Maeker
Svn commited 0.5.0 (tested) Eric 2012/12/18 Eric Maeker : > Hi, > > I'm working on the libquazip package to upgrade it to the new 0.5.0 upstream. > The watch file needs an update as the schema is > > when version ends with .0 -> remove it > > actually the watchfile contains > > http://sf.

Re: libquazip 0.5.0

2012-11-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Eric, On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 02:18:17PM +0100, Eric Maeker wrote: > Hi all, > > I'll update the debian files for the libquazip, there is a new version > 0.5.0. I can not find the change in SVN. Forgot to commit? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e