Hi,
I orphaned it today, so whoever would like to take care it can step up
directly. The package is simple and straghtforwrad, shouldn't be a lot
of trouble.
Regards,
Aron
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 5:13 AM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> thanks for your insights. I guess python-pygccxml is not directly needed
Hi
thanks for your insights. I guess python-pygccxml is not directly needed
here in Debian Med. On ITK’s side, pygccxml is present in ITK’s repo
as a subtree. So it is not needed as a dependency, and there is no plan
to change this.
I’ll leave the decision up to you. I personally recommend people
Actually I'm seeking to orphan the package as I don't use it myself
anymore, but it's not a burden so far so that I haven't done it yet.
If there are people interested in adopting or co-maintaining it'll be
appreciated. There's no any form of repository at the moment and I can
create one if no one
Hi Michka,
I keep the Debian maintainer Aron Xu in CC. Gccxml was maintained as a
predependency of some Debian Med package by the according team. I'm not
aware that python-pygccxml has any reverse dependencies in Debian Med
but surely ITK is of interest. Could the ITK people please raise their
> On August 5, 2015 03:29:30 PM Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
>
>>> I will try hard to get the script into VCS tonight and then I will welcome
>>> help in testing the builds on dependent packages.
>>
>> Great! Let me know when things are ready.
>
> OK. The gccxml package is updated with a wrapper ar
Hi Sébastien,
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:48:06AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
>
> Thanks for this proposition! I would of course be very happy to be able to
> upload the orthanc-related packages by myself. Orthanc 0.9.3 will soon be
> released and updates to orthanc-webviewer/orthanc-postgre
> > BTW, thanks for uploading the package!
>
> The thank goes fully to you. Just rebuilding and calling dput is not a
> big deal.
>
> BTW, do you want to get the upload feeling yourself? You are now
> maintaining several packages and have dived into the bug squashing
> business. So applying to
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:53:13AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
>
> No problem with this: I just try and centralize all the Debian-related
> automated mailing in a single mailbox, but this can certainly wait the next
> version of the package :)
Uploaders do not get any mail anyway. It might
Hi Andreas,
> I can confirm that I uploaded gdcm now to unstable. Unfortunately I
> missed the last change of your e-mail address as Uploader. I hope this
> will be no problem for you.
No problem with this: I just try and centralize all the Debian-related
automated mailing in a single mailbox,
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 09:41:39AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > But it also points out the way to simply replace gccxml by castxml. So I
> > > updated your patch to do that.
> >
> > Yes, this is much bette
Ahh, I'll try again - our mails have crossed
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > But it also points out the way to simply replace gccxml by castxml. So I
> > updated your patch to do that.
>
> Yes, this is much better now!
>
> > Unfortunately, I get a
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 01:40:16AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> [ 72%] Generating csharp/vtkGDCMImageReader-sentinel.txt
> cd /home/steve/Packages/gdcm/build-area/gdcm-2.4.4/obj-x86_64-linux-
> gnu/Utilities/VTK && /usr/bin/mummy --suppress-warnings 6005 6006 6009 6010
> 6012 6013 6015 60
Hi,
> But it also points out the way to simply replace gccxml by castxml. So I
> updated your patch to do that.
Yes, this is much better now!
> Unfortunately, I get a build failure with gdcm: [...]
> How did you avoid the "__int128" problem? I'm building on adm64 in an up-to-
> date sid chroot
Hi Sébastien,
Great work!
On August 6, 2015 04:28:37 PM Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple posts, but thanks to Steve's upload of gccxml last
> evening, I have finally managed to make the transition of the gdcm package
> to gcc-5. A single patch to the CMake scripts is necessary
Hi Sébastien,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
>
> Sorry for the multiple posts, but thanks to Steve's upload of gccxml last
> evening, I have finally managed to make the transition of the gdcm package to
> gcc-5. A single patch to the CMake scripts is necessar
Hi Andreas,
Hi Steve,
> > As a consequence, I would like to know when updated versions of the
> > libgdcm2.4 and libgdcm2-dev packages built with gcc-5 will be available in
> > the repositories. Is this information available somewhere?
>
> If you read the Debian Med mailing list you might have no
> Fine! With your updated version of gccxml, I was able to fix several build
> errors in the gdcm package. I had to apply one patch [1].
>
> Unfortunately, there are still build errors related to mummy that read as
> follow: [...]
Pursuing my investigations, I have just noticed that the argument
Hi,
> > > I will try hard to get the script into VCS tonight and then I will
> > > welcome
> > > help in testing the builds on dependent packages.
> >
> > Great! Let me know when things are ready.
>
> OK. The gccxml package is updated with a wrapper around castxml (the real
> binary is renamed
On August 5, 2015 03:29:30 PM Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> > I will try hard to get the script into VCS tonight and then I will welcome
> > help in testing the builds on dependent packages.
>
> Great! Let me know when things are ready.
OK. The gccxml package is updated with a wrapper around castx
> It was only incidentally related, in that GDCM build-depends on gccxml, which
> I'm trying to replace by a wrapper around castxml. I was doing so because of
> things like the above-mentioned bugs.
OK, thanks for clarifying this :)
> I didn't try, but I was under the impression that gdcm does n
On August 4, 2015 07:19:14 PM Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> > > As a consequence, I would like to know when updated versions of the
> > > libgdcm2.4 and libgdcm2-dev packages built with gcc-5 will be available
> > > in
> > > the repositories. Is this information available somewhere?
> >
> > If you re
> > As a consequence, I would like to know when updated versions of the
> > libgdcm2.4 and libgdcm2-dev packages built with gcc-5 will be available in
> > the repositories. Is this information available somewhere?
>
> If you read the Debian Med mailing list you might have noticed Steve's
> status
Hi
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:53:35PM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
>
> As a consequence, I would like to know when updated versions of the
> libgdcm2.4 and libgdcm2-dev packages built with gcc-5 will be available in
> the repositories. Is this information available somewhere?
If you read th
23 matches
Mail list logo
