Re: Snippy autopkgtest claims that snpeff is version 0

2023-02-03 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 03/02/2023 à 13:05, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi Pierre, Am Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:32:07AM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: [16:13:15] Found snippy-vcf_to_tab - /usr/bin/snippy-vcf_to_tab [16:13:15] Found snippy-vcf_report - /usr/bin/snippy-vcf_report [16:13:15] Checking version: samt

Re: Snippy autopkgtest claims that snpeff is version 0

2023-02-03 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Andreas Tille writes: > +Architecture: amd64 arm64 Indeed. Sorry for making this restriction necessary, and for missing the need for it earlier -- I suppose Britney doesn't check very far up the reverse dependency tree for autopkgtest regressions, just for buildability ones, and doesn't care if

Re: Snippy autopkgtest claims that snpeff is version 0

2023-02-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Pierre, Am Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:32:07AM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > > [16:13:15] Found snippy-vcf_to_tab - /usr/bin/snippy-vcf_to_tab > > [16:13:15] Found snippy-vcf_report - /usr/bin/snippy-vcf_report > > [16:13:15] Checking version: samtools --version is >= 1.7 - ok, have 1.16 > > [16:13

Re: Snippy autopkgtest claims that snpeff is version 0

2023-02-03 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 03/02/2023 à 11:17, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi, I realised that snippy autopkgtest is failing for i386 and s390x[1] The log for i386[2] says: Get:310 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main i386 libsnpeff-java all 5.1+d+dfsg-3 [2,150 kB] ... [16:13:15] Found snpEff - /usr/bi