Re: Role of libeazel

2009-09-30 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:48:24AM -0400, Sean Eddy wrote: > I notice on the Debian mailing list that you are concerned about code > duplication on our end. There is no code duplication; Easel is a > single Subversion repository, and HMMER and Infernal source > distributions simply get packaged wit

Re: Role of libeazel

2009-09-30 Thread Sean Eddy
>I intend to update the Debian package of infernal to the newest stable >version (1.0). I just noticed that it contains a copy of libeazel. I >became curious about this library because it looked rather like a >separate piece of code. My research enedet up in another copy of this >libr

Re: Role of libeazel

2009-09-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 04:54:05PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > > ... and it is probably not worth the effort. > > So just submit infernal as it is. Some extra package can be done any time > later. I have no problem with this, but I'd prefer if an infernal user would have a look on my packagi

Re: Role of libeazel

2009-09-28 Thread Steffen Moeller
Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:34:08PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: ... > >> We should >> nonetheless prepare for it. I could imagine that both the HMMER and the >> Infernal packages offer a binary package libeazel-hmmer/libeazel-infernal and >> that these are given the tag "Pr

Re: Role of libeazel

2009-09-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:34:08PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > It seems like a good idea to have those pieces as separate libraries. The > drive > towards it should come from upstream, though, not from us. Sure. That's why I putted upstream in CC. IMHO the interest of upstream in consolidat

Re: Role of libeazel

2009-09-28 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hello, Andreas Tille wrote: > I intend to update the Debian package of infernal to the newest stable > version (1.0). I just noticed that it contains a copy of libeazel. I > became curious about this library because it looked rather like a > separate piece of code. My research enedet up in ano

Re: Role of libeazel

2009-09-27 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:17:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to update the Debian package of infernal to the newest stable > version (1.0). I just noticed that it contains a copy of libeazel. I > became curious about this library because it looked rather like a > separate pi