Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-11 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Julien, Julien Yann Dutheil, on 2020-05-11 11:00:31 +0200: > Got a reply from Ziheng Yang, the author of PAML. He said he will include > the suggested changes upstream. Great! Thank you! > PS: does this solve the issue or is there anything else I should do :s ? I would be tempted to think t

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-11 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Hi, Got a reply from Ziheng Yang, the author of PAML. He said he will include the suggested changes upstream. Best, Julien. PS: does this solve the issue or is there anything else I should do :s ? On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:59 AM Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Julien, > > Andreas Tille, on 2020

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-10 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Julien, Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-10 07:06:09 +0200: > On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:32:32PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > For once, maybe I can be of some help there. I shall be able to reach the > > author of PAML directly... shall I give it a try? > > Yes, please forward the patch - ba

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:32:32PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > For once, maybe I can be of some help there. I shall be able to reach the > author of PAML directly... shall I give it a try? Yes, please forward the patch - basically in the interest of the PAML authors themselves. Kind regar

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Hi, For once, maybe I can be of some help there. I shall be able to reach the author of PAML directly... shall I give it a try? Julien. On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 8:31 PM Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Crusoe, on 2020-05-09 19:48:06 +0200: > > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:27 PM Étien

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Michael, Michael Crusoe, on 2020-05-09 19:48:06 +0200: > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:27 PM Étienne Mollier > wrote: > > > Good day, > > > > > > I have not forwarded the patch for the moment, since reporting > > bugs requires posting in a Google Group that forbids contact > > through email, and I

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Michael Crusoe
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:27 PM Étienne Mollier wrote: > Good day, > > > I have not forwarded the patch for the moment, since reporting > bugs requires posting in a Google Group that forbids contact > through email, and I have no Google account for the moment, at > least none usable to my knowledg

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-09 18:44:40 +0200: > On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > > IMHO if upstream makes it very hard to be contacted our effort > > > we should do should not be exagerated. > > > > I'm not entirely sure I understood your opinion, bu

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > IMHO if upstream makes it very hard to be contacted our effort > > we should do should not be exagerated. > > I'm not entirely sure I understood your opinion, but if there > are more projects requiring a Google Account to contact

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-09 15:01:33 +0200: > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > I fixed another Gcc-10 FTBFS, for the "paml" package this time, > > and took this opportunity to run routine-update. > > Thanks a lot. You're welcome, thanks for the up

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I fixed another Gcc-10 FTBFS, for the "paml" package this time, > and took this opportunity to run routine-update. Thanks a lot. > Manual pages > are still missing though. Actually, I have no clue how are > supposed