Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-4 (Was: python-biopython_1.78+dfsg-4_source.changes REJECTED)

2020-12-06 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-12-06 17:07:14 +0100: > Permissions granted (can not do much more out of a train with bad > connectivity) Thanks for the permission, especially in the poor networking conditions. I received the acknowledgement of dak, and now python-biopython is uploaded. Hav

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-4 (Was: python-biopython_1.78+dfsg-4_source.changes REJECTED)

2020-12-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Permissions granted (can not do much more out of a train with bad connectivity) On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 04:17:05PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > Steffen Möller, on 2020-12-06 15:10:52 +0100: > > The only thing I suggest to add (to help backporting) is to add a > > version depend

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-4 (Was: python-biopython_1.78+dfsg-4_source.changes REJECTED)

2020-12-06 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller, on 2020-12-06 15:10:52 +0100: > The only thing I suggest to add (to help backporting) is to add a > version dependency on dssp (> 4) to help backporting since the versions > are diverse across our releases > (https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dssp&searchon=nam

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-4 (Was: python-biopython_1.78+dfsg-4_source.changes REJECTED)

2020-12-06 Thread Steffen Möller
Heya, The only thing I suggest to add (to help backporting) is to add a version dependency on dssp (> 4) to help backporting since the versions are diverse across our releases (https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dssp&searchon=names&exact=1&suite=all§ion=all). Best, Steffen On 06.12.20

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-18 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller, on 2020-10-17 19:54:17 +0200: > uploaded - thank you for this, had given up on it once :) You're welcome, thanks for the upload. :) Cheers, -- Étienne Mollier Old rsa/3072: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54 2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d New rsa/4096: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-17 Thread Steffen Möller
uploaded - thank you for this, had given up on it once :) On 17.10.20 14:25, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hello, > > I prepared an update of python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3, to address > #972381 mainly, but it also includes pending removal of some > makeblastdb overrides. The package is available on Sal

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Étienne Mollier writes: > Many, many thanks for your swift update. No problem. > I'm reverting most of > my changes to python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3 packaging to make > sure no overrides risk interferring with your tuning during the > build or autopkgtest, and bump the requirements to ncbi-blast

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-05 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Aaron, Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-10-05 08:57:43 -0400: > u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > > > issue a give-back request for python-biopython on mipsel once a suitable > > new BLAST+ build is available there. > > Update: The new BLAST+ build showed up overnight (from my time zone, > anyw

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
u...@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > issue a give-back request for python-biopython on mipsel once a suitable > new BLAST+ build is available there. Update: The new BLAST+ build showed up overnight (from my time zone, anyway) as expected, and python-biopython's mipsel status changed from "Fa

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3

2020-10-04 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Étienne Mollier writes: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-biopython&arch=mipsel&ver=1.78%2Bdfsg-2&stamp=1601713196&raw=0 Thanks for the report! I don't have access to any buildd servers, but I was able to reproduce makeblastdb failures with current defaults on the

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3 (Was: 1.78+dfsg-2)

2020-10-04 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-10-03 10:06:59 +0200: > uploaded. Thanks a lot for caring for the migration of this > important package Thank you as well for the upload. Alas the build log still looks like the run chokes on makeblastdb memory commit issues. :( ==

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-2

2020-10-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, uploaded. Thanks a lot for caring for the migration of this important package Andreas. On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:08:42AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi All, > > I think these changes to python-biopython stalled on my machine > for long enough. The release 1.78+dfsg-2 re

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-1

2020-09-14 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-09-14 13:51:18 +0200: > Hi Étienne, > > thanks a lot for your work on this. My suggestions for changes are so > unimportant that I do not want to rebuild just to fix these. You're welcome, thank you for your insights and the upload! > Please add some DEP3 des

Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-1

2020-09-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, thanks a lot for your work on this. My suggestions for changes are so unimportant that I do not want to rebuild just to fix these. On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I have the following lintian warning, which I am not sure what > to do with. I believ

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:20:37AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > I've just uploaded (today the build went smoothly). > > Thank you for the review and upload. :) You are more than welcome. :-) > > Thanks a lot for your investigation > > You're welcome. Next in my to do list i

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-17 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-06-17 08:05:57 +0200: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:41:28PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > I pushed a little change in the d/control file of the package > > python-biopython in version 1.77+dfsg-2. This was the suggested > > way to address the bug #962944: > >

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:41:28PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I pushed a little change in the d/control file of the package > python-biopython in version 1.77+dfsg-2. This was the suggested > way to address the bug #962944: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-16 Thread Étienne Mollier
Howdy, I pushed a little change in the d/control file of the package python-biopython in version 1.77+dfsg-2. This was the suggested way to address the bug #962944: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962944 I couldn't reproduce any particular problem with the few last rou

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-16 Thread Étienne Mollier
Étienne Mollier, on 2020-06-16 18:51:52 +0200: > I'm on it. I'm a bit unsure of the maximum possible, but having > left my machine compute rosetta jobs for more than 80 > consecutive days, all I can say is that the limit is well over > the million. It is pid_max according to Linux documentation,

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-16 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andrius, mer...@debian.org, on 2020-06-16 19:46:00 +0300: > Hi Étienne, > > On 2020-06-16 19:41, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > As a side note, I remarked that t_coffee dislikes it when its > > PID is greater than 26: > > > > $ t_coffee -version > > PROGRAM: T-COFFEE Version_13.41.0.28

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-16 Thread merkys
Hi Étienne, On 2020-06-16 19:41, Étienne Mollier wrote: > As a side note, I remarked that t_coffee dislikes it when its > PID is greater than 26: > > $ t_coffee -version > PROGRAM: T-COFFEE Version_13.41.0.28bdc39 (2019-11-30 10:21:53 - > Revision 5d5a1c1 - Build 465) > >

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-16 Thread Étienne Mollier
Greetings, mer...@debian.org, on 2020-06-15 14:48:07 +0300: > On 2020-06-12 20:40, Steffen Möller wrote: > > I found this > > > > Bio.PDB.mmtf docstring test ... skipped, missing Python dependency > > Bio.PDB.mmtf.DefaultParser docstring test ... skipped, missing Python > > dependency > > Bio.PDB

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-15 Thread merkys
On 2020-06-12 20:40, Steffen Möller wrote: > I found this > > Bio.PDB.mmtf docstring test ... skipped, missing Python dependency > Bio.PDB.mmtf.DefaultParser docstring test ... skipped, missing Python > dependency > Bio.PDB.mmtf.mmtfio docstring test ... skipped, missing Python dependency > > to s

Re: PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-12 Thread merkys
On 2020-06-12 20:40, Steffen Möller wrote: > to suggest packaging https://github.com/rcsb/mmtf-python - sigh. Any > takers? Would be quite a fit for next week's hackathon, I presume. FYI, python3-mmtf has just been mentioned as required by Debichem team. A RFP bug has just been opened [1]. I am mi

PhyML error - does that ring any bell? Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-12 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, I need to thank you for this update. I had not looked at BioPython for a lnnggg time. Pretty impressive how it all developed. I found this Bio.PDB.mmtf docstring test ... skipped, missing Python dependency Bio.PDB.mmtf.DefaultParser docstring test ... skipped, missing Python depen

Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-12 Thread Steffen Möller
On 12.06.20 18:39, Étienne Mollier wrote: Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller, on 2020-06-12 18:31:57 +0200: I am at it - do you mind me adding you to the list of maintainers? I suppose you meant the Uploaders field ? Sure, if it helps. ;) it helped in the past - also @Pranav and @Nilesh, you have

Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller, on 2020-06-12 18:31:57 +0200: > I am at it - do you mind me adding you to the list of maintainers? I suppose you meant the Uploaders field ? Sure, if it helps. Kind Regards, -- Étienne Mollier Fingerprint: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54 2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d Help fi

Re: RFS: python-biopython

2020-06-12 Thread Steffen Möller
I am at it - do you mind me adding you to the list of maintainers? Best, Steffen On 11.06.20 23:54, Étienne Mollier wrote: Greetings, While working on #960756[1] affecting src:python-biopython[2] on 32bit architecture CPUs, uscan caught a newer version of the library. So I took the liberty o