Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

> > There is no precedence for storing Journals as far as I know > > Ok, I'll ignore the Journaling by now,... > > Maybe Bhaskar can advise on what is > > the right thing to do with that directory. > > [KSB] I am puzzled as to the lack of precedents for journals in Debian, > but OK. > > Lik

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

On 07/14/2012 01:38 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Tille > wrote: I confirm that the questions Nicolas Barbier has asked in his replay to your mail are the same questions which are somehow bothering me as well (so I will no

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I confirm that the questions Nicolas Barbier has asked in his replay to > your mail are the same questions which are somehow bothering me as well > (so I will not repeat these here). > > > /var/lib/vista/ > > /var/lib/vista/r > > /var/lib

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

Hi, On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 09:03:51AM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote: > > Our first rough cut at the directory structure > for the VistA Debian package has been: I confirm that the questions Nicolas Barbier has asked in his replay to your mail are the same questions which are somehow bothering me as

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

2012/7/14 Luis Ibanez : > Our first rough cut at the directory structure > for the VistA Debian package has been: > > > /var/lib/vista/ > /var/lib/vista/r > /var/lib/vista/o > /var/lib/vista/g > /var/lib/vista/j > /var/lib/vista/logs > /var/lib/vista/inetd > /var/lib/vista/profile (I apologize be

Re: Packaging VistA - GT.M directories

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: > Although GT.M is very flexible when it comes to configuration - it is all > managed with environment variables - configuring directories one way vs. > another can make it easier or harder to manage configurations. Two points > worth noting a