Re: Packaging ITK version 5

2020-11-16 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Steve, Hi Gert, I suppose targeting experimental at first makes sense. I have not spent that much time interacting with ITK, and may be a bit short on spare cycles in the coming week, so don't believe I have that much to add. :) I remember we've agreed on the upstream "withdata" notation ear

Re: Packaging ITK version 5

2020-11-16 Thread Steven Robbins
On Monday, November 16, 2020 5:49:09 A.M. CST Gert Wollny wrote: > > My thought is to upload to experimental first. I don't see any > > "experimental" branch in salsa, but maybe I can just create one? Or > > would it be better to make an itk5 branch? > > I'd suggest to use a new project altoge

Re: Packaging ITK version 5

2020-11-16 Thread Gert Wollny
Hello Steve, thanks for looking into this. Am Sonntag, den 15.11.2020, 13:07 -0600 schrieb Steven Robbins: > Hi, > > I have a bit of time today and thought I'd look into packaging ITK > 5.1.1. > > My thought is to upload to experimental first. I don't see any > "experimental" branch in salsa

Re: Packaging ITK version 5

2020-11-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Steven, On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 01:07:26PM -0600, Steven Robbins wrote: > I have a bit of time today and thought I'd look into packaging ITK 5.1.1. Thanks for caring for itk. > My thought is to upload to experimental first. I don't see any > "experimental" > branch in salsa, but maybe I c