On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > and whether you want me to sponsor the current status in Git. Please ping
> > me explicitly about
> > sponsering.
> Sponsoring would be nice, especially since the other version didn't make
> it to the archives and there are some FTB
Hello Andreas,
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 08:51 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I reverted this to 2.0.9-1 because I do not see any reason for bumping
> to 2.0.9-2 as long as there is no 2.0.9-1 inside the archive. I have no
> idea whether this answers your question
Yes, it does.
> and whether you
Hi Gert,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> I've added two patches to the upload, a regression fix and some change a
> colleague of mine needed in some experimental code.
>
> If I interpreted the messaged correctly the other version is not yet
> uploaded to ftp-master
Hello,
I've added two patches to the upload, a regression fix and some change a
colleague of mine needed in some experimental code.
If I interpreted the messaged correctly the other version is not yet
uploaded to ftp-master, but to avoid any complications if it happens
while I'm writing this I
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > > That's true. I would also prefer if you would use pristine-tar as it is
> > > described in Debian Med team policy.
>
> I guess I was a bit in a rush last Friday, now I got around to check
> everything again, and I can confirm tha
Hello Andreas,
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 11:41 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 22:09 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > The changes are already in git, the source package still is just
> > > uploaded to sourceforge, which means the watchfile may not yet find the
> > > version.
> >
>
Hello Andreas,
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 22:09 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > The changes are already in git, the source package still is just
> > uploaded to sourceforge, which means the watchfile may not yet find the
> > version.
>
> That's true. I would also prefer if you would use pristine-ta
Hi Gert,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:19:51PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> I've created a new upstream version of the package that fixes two of the
> three bugs that came up in the multi-arch compiling and works around the
> third:
>
> Bug#705383: mia: FTBFS on i386: 3 tests failed out of 228
> *
Hello Andreas,
I've created a new upstream version of the package that fixes two of the
three bugs that came up in the multi-arch compiling and works around the
third:
Bug#705383: mia: FTBFS on i386: 3 tests failed out of 228
* I commented on that before
Bug#705384: mia:FTBFS on architectures
Hi Gert,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> ...
> For that reason I added two more patches and uploaded all with a new
> changelog entry. I also added a tag for the debian/2.0.8-1 version you
> uploaded to ftpmaster.
Thanks for your work on this. I'd suggest I wait
Hi Andreas,
> Thanks for your work on this. Package is uploaded - hope for smooth
> passing of ftpnew queue.
It turned out that testing on powerpc and x86_64 didn't cover the bases
as I hoped, i.e. some tests failed on i386.
For that reason I added two more patches and uploaded all with a new
Hi Gert,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:36:24PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> ...
> regarding the comments from ftp-master
> - removed vistaio and boost files that had different licenses
> and are not used anyway.
> - re-licensed remaining files from LPGL 2.1+ to GPL3+
>
> As usual I tested build
Hello Andreas,
I've pushed the latest version to the server. Changes with respect to
the last version:
- upstream is now 2.0.8
- tested on powerpc (32 bit) and x86_64.
- one patch removed, three added
* one to silence a lintian manpage error warning
* one to fix a test on powerpc
* on
Hi Gert
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:29:02PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> now that the package has been rejected I will go for the new release
> right away. Since on PowerPC some tests fail, this will probably take
> some time.
Just take the time you need
> I would guess that this still holds, r
Hi Andreas,
now that the package has been rejected I will go for the new release
right away. Since on PowerPC some tests fail, this will probably take
some time.
I would guess that this still holds, right?
> Just create a new changelog entry pretending you would create a new
> package version
Hi Gert,
I admit that currently new processing is more or less stalled and I
guess that ftpmaster is doing this on purpose to fully concentrate on
the next release. Because it is your first package and you are lacking
some experience: This is *not* normal and usually the time for new
packages unt
Hello,
since the MIA package is still in the ftp-master pipeline and I'm
closing in for a new release that fixes a few issues, I was wondering
how I should handle the situation.
Should I prepare everything based on the already existing git tree, or
should I redo the package from scratch? In sho
Hello Andreas,
On 12/17/12 21:38, Andreas Tille wrote:
Fine. Package is uploaded. Please `git pull` for my latest change to
use xz compression - the dbg packages are quite large and using xz makes
some difference here.
Good to know how this can be done :)
Thanks, for the help.
Since the two
Hi Gert,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:04:29PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
>
> I renamed the according packages to mia-tools, mia-tools-dbg, and
> mia-tools-doc. The libmia-2.0-dev package descripion was also
> updated.
Fine. Package is uploaded. Please `git pull` for my latest change to
use xz com
Hello Andreas,
I pushed the changes. It took a bit more time, because I wanted to make
the build more strict to make sure that missing dependencies are not
silently dropped.
On 12/17/12 09:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
OK, this did not yet changed - so I'm waiting for your confirmation.
Besides t
Hi Gert,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:35:28AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > I guess candidates would be mia2-bin for imaging and libmia-2.0-dev for
> > imaging-dev right?
> Yes.
>
> > From my personal taste I would prefer mia2-tools or
> > even mia-tools (I personally do not see a need to duplic
Hello Andreas,
> Great. As you might have noticed I did some changes - please check out
> the commit logs.
I see.
>
> > This package provides real image processing funcionality and is the
> > biggest package I'm currently preparing. i.e. this is the one that
> > should probably end up in on
Hi Gert,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:58:09PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've uploaded the MIA package to git.debian.org/git/debian-med/mia.git
Great. As you might have noticed I did some changes - please check out
the commit logs.
> This package provides real image processing funci
23 matches
Mail list logo
