Hi Sébastien,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:58:16PM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
>
> After some inspection, the launch script for imagej (/usr/bin/imagej)
> overrides the default classpath at line 225 [1]. As a consequence, having the
> JAR package of json-simple in "/usr/share/java" is u
> > So, there would be a global CLASSPATH that is shared across all the
> > JVMs available in Debian, and that is implicitly used by the
> > ImageJ package? Anyone could confirm this?
>
> As far as I know any JAR that's found in /usr/share/java will be
> included in CLASSPATH. (Please correct me
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:00:09AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> > I admit I know to less about Java but the "merge" you are mentioning
> > in a) is not clear to me. If you Build-Depend on libjson-simple-java
> > the JAR which is in Debian's CLASSPATH will be available as well for
> > th
> I admit I know to less about Java but the "merge" you are mentioning
> in a) is not clear to me. If you Build-Depend on libjson-simple-java
> the JAR which is in Debian's CLASSPATH will be available as well for
> the installed package if you Depend from libjson-simple-java. So
> I see no reason
Hi Sébastien,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:14:15AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> > which should be avoided. Could you imagine to rather "link" (I think
> > linking is not the proper term in the Java world) against this
> > library
> > rather than using the code copy.
>
> I see 2 possibil
Hi Andreas,
> sorry for my silence for longer than usual. I'm recovering slowly
> from
> my vacation (basically for the sake of OpenStreetMap work after the
> trip
> ;-)).
:)
> I had a look into the package. It builds fine and is lintian clean
> and
> I simply assume that it is working (I hav
Hi Sebastien,
sorry for my silence for longer than usual. I'm recovering slowly from
my vacation (basically for the sake of OpenStreetMap work after the trip
;-)).
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:16:57AM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> >thanks for your work but can you please commi
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your work but can you please commit to SVN as you did with
orthanc. There is no point in sending code that belongs to VCS via
mail.
Sorry for the corrupted mail, I thought I was not allowed to create new
packages into the SVN. I have just managed to push the initial ve
Hi Sébastien,
thanks for your work but can you please commit to SVN as you did with
orthanc. There is no point in sending code that belongs to VCS via
mail.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:24:17PM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> > I (stubbornly
Hi Andreas,
> I (stubbornly ;-)) stick to my opinion for a separate package since
> orthanc works perfectly without the imagej plugin and as far as I
> understand its also a separate source. So its pretty natural to have
> a
> separate package but you can Suggest (or even Recommend) the plugin
>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:49:34AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> > As an aside, and regardless of whether ImageJ or the ImageJ
> > Orthanc Plugin are useful in their own right, let me
> > reiterate that ImageJ is irrelevant to the practice of
> > medicine.
>
> Even though I definitely a
Hi Sébastien,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:49:34AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> Hi Andreas and Karsten,
>
> > > Side question: Should my plugin be part of the "orthanc" package
> > > [1], of the "imagej" package, or should it be fully standalone?
> >
> > It is probably a lot easier for
Hi Andreas and Karsten,
> > Side question: Should my plugin be part of the "orthanc" package
> > [1], of the "imagej" package, or should it be fully standalone?
>
> It is probably a lot easier for you to make it part of the
> orthanc package.
Mid-air collision with Andreas' answer, who would fav
Hi Sébastien,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:16:54AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> > My plugin is already correctly packaged wrt. the ImageJ SDK. But
> > could you recommend some nicely packaged software for Debian that
> > uses a combination of Java and CMake? This would be quite useful for
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:16:54AM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> > My plugin is already correctly packaged wrt. the ImageJ SDK. But
> > could you recommend some nicely packaged software for Debian that
> > uses a combination of Java and CMake? This would be quite useful for
> > me.
>
>
> My plugin is already correctly packaged wrt. the ImageJ SDK. But
> could you recommend some nicely packaged software for Debian that
> uses a combination of Java and CMake? This would be quite useful for
> me.
Side question: Should my plugin be part of the "orthanc" package [1], of the
"imagej"
Hi,
> > Is there any package in Debian Med that contains an ImageJ plugin?
> > I would need such an example as a starting point.
>
> I'm not aware of any such example. [...]
OK, this confirms my understanding :)
> The ImageJ documentation might provide some help where to put the
> files
> belo
Hi Sebastien,
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 04:30:47PM +0100, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> > > My question is related to Debian Med: Would anyone be interested in
> > > packaging this plugin for Debian?
> >
> > For me this sounds pretty useful. If you might consider packaging it
>
Hi Andreas,
> > My question is related to Debian Med: Would anyone be interested in
> > packaging this plugin for Debian?
>
> For me this sounds pretty useful. If you might consider packaging it
> yourself I would support this if any questions might occure.
Is there any package in Debian Med th
Hi Sebastien,
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:36:50AM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
> I write this message to warn you that I have just published an
> ImageJ plugin to browse the content of an Orthanc server, then
> import 2D/3D DICOM images from Orthanc into ImageJ.
> ...
Sounds good.
> My questi
20 matches
Mail list logo
