Re: How is autopkgtest working in Perl packages

2024-03-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2024-03-12: > Cool. It would be great if we could get rid of 32bit emboss related > packages to get back all those packages in testing which were removed > now. In the particular case of bioperl-run, there are only single Architecture: all "binary" packages, so nothi

Re: How is autopkgtest working in Perl packages

2024-03-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:29:30PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > The change turns out to be much more involved than I initially > thought: we need to account for the build dependencies as well > as the recommends, and tests don't go skipped that easily, > because the control on skippable entries

Re: How is autopkgtest working in Perl packages

2024-03-11 Thread Étienne Mollier
Étienne Mollier, on 2024-03-11: > I think it may be skipped for now by > creating a debian/tests/pkg-perl/SKIP file containing: > > runtime-deps-and-recommends The change turns out to be much more involved than I initially thought: we need to account for the build dependencies as well as the reco

Re: How is autopkgtest working in Perl packages

2024-03-11 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2024-03-11: > when trying to exclude clustalw and emboss from bioperl-run I learned > that its autopkgtest is failing for all architectures but amd64. The > reason is that the test wants to install pftools which is only available > on amd646. Thus all autopkgtests f