On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:47:15PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
> On 09.06.20 19:28, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Andreas Tille writes:
> >
> > > Really? Or only commited without push?
> > Oops, pushed for real now. (I'd originally used "gbp push", which wound
> > up deciding for some reason to
On 09.06.20 19:28, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Andreas Tille writes:
Really? Or only commited without push?
Oops, pushed for real now. (I'd originally used "gbp push", which wound
up deciding for some reason to push my nonexistent changes to upstream
and pristine-tar rather than my actual change
Andreas Tille writes:
> Really? Or only commited without push?
Oops, pushed for real now. (I'd originally used "gbp push", which wound
up deciding for some reason to push my nonexistent changes to upstream
and pristine-tar rather than my actual change to master. Perhaps "salsa
push" would hav
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:03:06PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Could you commit a patch since my C++ knowledge is extremely
> > limited (even if I have a vague feeling what you mean).
>
> Pushed.
Really? Or only commited without push?
> > I do not even have a feeling what you mean. :-(
>
Andreas Tille writes:
> thanks a lot for your analysis.
No problem. I work with C++ on a daily basis.
>> - Wrong CTPL, now addressed.
>
> :-)
... thanks! :-)
> Could you commit a patch since my C++ knowledge is extremely
> limited (even if I have a vague feeling what you mean).
Pushed.
> I
Hi Aaron,
thanks a lot for your analysis.
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:18:30AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>
> I'd initially thought I was looking at a single cascade of errors, but
> there turned out to be three separate problems here:
>
> - Wrong CTPL, now addressed.
:-)
> - References to ii
Andreas Tille writes:
> Sorry, my fault. Pushed now.
Thanks!
I'd initially thought I was looking at a single cascade of errors, but
there turned out to be three separate problems here:
- Wrong CTPL, now addressed.
- References to iit<...> and iitii<...> without explicit iitii::
namespace p
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:35:46AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> >> [1] http://ctpl.tuxfamily.org/
> >> [2] https://github.com/vit-vit/CTPL
> >
> > OK, I fixed this in Git - but this does not change the error messages
> > unfortunately. :-(
>
> Thanks, but I don't see any commits to the iitii repo
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:57:03PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>> AFAICT, these stem from the fact that Debian's libctpl-dev corresponds
>> to [1], whereas iitii's test wants the unrelated [2].
>>
>> [1] http://ctpl.tuxfamily.org/
>> [2] https://github.com/vit-vit/CTPL
>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:57:03PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > I've started packaging iitii[1]. Building the binary and moving the
> > header file into a libiitii-dev package works but the build time test
> > was hard enough to get configuring at all. But know there are build
> > issues insid
Andreas Tille writes:
> I've started packaging iitii[1]. Building the binary and moving the
> header file into a libiitii-dev package works but the build time test
> was hard enough to get configuring at all. But know there are build
> issues inside the test:
AFAICT, these stem from the fact t
Tried, but
On 08.06.20 22:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I've started packaging iitii[1]. Building the binary and moving the
header file into a libiitii-dev package works but the build time test
was hard enough to get configuring at all. But know there are build
issues inside the test:
...
/bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
