Hi Lennart,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:00:35AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>
> Likewise! Let's keep this up in the future. I'll probably be back with
> some packaging questions when upstream releases a new version.
Or with some other package or you pick some Debian Med package and
squash a bug of
Hi Andreas,
On 17-12-13 10:37, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:17:47AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks for these hints. In took me a wile to figure it out, but it
>> turned out to be simple. The main missing piece of information was the
>> when buildin
Hi Lennart,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:17:47AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> > DEBEXAMPLES:=$(DEBPKGNAME)-examples
> >
> > in the beginning of your rules file and than moving the files around.
> >
> > If you want to check the more general packaging docs the keyword is
> > probably "multi binary p
Hi Andreas,
On 16-12-13 09:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
>
>> What would be the best way to start a probabel-examples package? Simply
>> start from scratch and make sure that I only install the examples? Or is
>> there a 'magic' way to do this in the present directory structure?
>
>
Hi Lennart,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:10:37AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> > :-)
>
> A bit later than planned, but the ITP bug has been filed (#732264).
:-)
> What would be the best way to start a probabel-examples package? Simply
> start from scratch and make sure that I only install the exam
Hi Andreas,
On 13-12-13 16:26, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:05:36PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>>> since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a
>>> good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp).
>>
>> That's good ne
Hi Lennart,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:05:36PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> > since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a
> > good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp).
>
> That's good news! I'll do that probably later today.
:-)
> > There is a
Hi Andreas,
On 13-12-13 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a
> good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp).
That's good news! I'll do that probably later today.
>
> There is also the warning abou
Hi Lennart,
since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a
good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp).
There is also the warning about
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 11103kB 91%
After having a look into /usr/share/probabel/examples and
/usr/sha
Hi Lennart,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:24:41AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> > At my side even now the test does not pass. Does your current packaging
> > build in pbuilder (and are you sure you pushed everything)?
>
> Ah, my bad. I Ran the wrong pbuilder (Ubuntu). Debian Wheezy doesn't
> have th
Hi Andreas,
On 13-12-13 09:38, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
>
> $ git diff
> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> index 4ece2fa..970e910 100755
> --- a/debian/rules
> +++ b/debian/rules
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ GIT_TAG:= $(subst ~,_,$(VERSION))
> # a
Hi Lennart,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:26:52AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> >> And drags in a whole bunch of dependencies, wow :-). I agree d/control
> >> looks better now.
> >
> > While it looks better it actually does not drag something additional in
> > - just reformatting dependencies to have
Hi Andreas,
On 12-12-13 09:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:20:39AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>> Sorry, what is "dquilt" - I only know quilt (without the d in the
>>> beginning)?
>>
>> dquilt is an alias for quilt created in sections 3.1/3.2
Hi Lennart,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:20:39AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> > Sorry, what is "dquilt" - I only know quilt (without the d in the
> > beginning)?
>
> dquilt is an alias for quilt created in sections 3.1/3.2 of the URL
> mentioned above:
> alias dquilt='quilt --quiltr
Hi Andreas,
On 12-12-13 09:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19:25PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
For the extIDS.pl file I would like to solve the problem by installing
it in the examples directory (that's where it actually belongs, it's not
required for regular us
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19:25PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> >> For the extIDS.pl file I would like to solve the problem by installing
> >> it in the examples directory (that's where it actually belongs, it's not
> >> required for regular use) instead of /usr/bin/. To this end I want to
> >> pat
On 11-12-13 21:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> just commit+push your patch and I'll check.
Done!
Lennart.
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:10:01PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On 11-12-13 11:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Hi Len
Hi Lennart,
just commit+push your patch and I'll check.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:10:01PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 11-12-13 11:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Lennart,
> >
> >
> >> 2) 2x W: probabel: script-with-language-extension
> >>
Hi Andreas,
On 11-12-13 11:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
>
>> 2) 2x W: probabel: script-with-language-extension
>> This is something we discuss upstream. One of them can be fixed
>> relatively easily, I think. The other one may interfere too much with
>> what users currently exp
Hi Lennart,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:16:31AM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> I'll stick with plain rm, because, as you pointed out, I'd like to know
> something is broken if the file is removed/renamed upstream.
Fine.
> > ...
> > override_dh_installchangelogs:
> > dh_installc
On 10-12-13 19:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:09:46PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>
>>> override_dh_installdocs:
>>> dh_installdocs
>>> find debian -name INSTALL -delete
>>> rm -f debian/$(DEBPKGNAME)/usr/share/doc/$(DEBPKGNAME)/COPYING
>>> /LICENSE
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:09:46PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> >> So git push --tags will do the job.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Done.
:-)
> > override_dh_installdocs:
> > dh_installdocs
> > find debian -name INSTALL -delete
> > rm -f debian/$(DEBPKGNAME)/usr/share/doc/$(DEBPKGNAME)/COPYI
Hi Andreas,
On 10-12-13 08:50, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:39:48PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>> Ah, I see:
>> $ git tag
>> upstream/0.4.1
>> So git push --tags will do the job.
>
> Yes.
Done.
>
2) W: probabel: package-contains-upstream-install-doc
Hi Lennart,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:39:48PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> >>> git push --tags
> >>>
> >>> since no tags are set yet and at least the upstream version should be
> >>> tagged.
> >>
> >> So I need to tag the whole probabel directory (source + debian/ dir)
> >> with the upst
Hi Andreas,
On 09-12-13 15:19, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 02:49:38PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>>>
>>> git push --tags
>>>
>>> since no tags are set yet and at least the upstream version should be
>>> tagged.
>>
>> So I need to tag the whole probabel directory
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 02:49:38PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> >
> > git push --tags
> >
> > since no tags are set yet and at least the upstream version should be
> > tagged.
>
> So I need to tag the whole probabel directory (source + debian/ dir)
> with the upstream version numbe
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the feedback.
On 09-12-13 09:11, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 11:17:19PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>
> Seems this has worked since I'm able to rungit-buildpackage. Please do
> not forget
>
> git push --tags
>
> since no tags
Hi Lennart,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 11:17:19PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I followed the steps outlined below, so my first commit of the ProbABEL
> packaging files should have landed in the git repo.
>
> I had a small hiccup when running git push --set-upstream, but when I
> ran
Dear list,
I followed the steps outlined below, so my first commit of the ProbABEL
packaging files should have landed in the git repo.
I had a small hiccup when running git push --set-upstream, but when I
ran the suggested solution it worked:
$ git push --set-upstream
fatal: The current bra
Hi Lennart
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:40:53PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> Alright, git it will be then.
>
>
> If I read the policy correctly this boils down to the following, right?
>
> mkdir package
> cd package
> git init
> git import-orig --pristine-tar /path/to/package_version.orig.tar.gz
Dear Andreas,
On 04-12-13 21:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> thanks for your effort to become a skilled packager in Debian Med team.
> As you can see we are a team competing in doing the work of mentoring.
> ;-)
>
Good to see so many enthousiastic people.
> I just add some more f
Hi Lennart,
thanks for your effort to become a skilled packager in Debian Med team.
As you can see we are a team competing in doing the work of mentoring.
;-)
I just add some more further things to Steffen's answer.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:46:52PM +0100, "Steffen Möller" wrote:
> > Dear list,
32 matches
Mail list logo
